[DRAFT] feat(concurrent): enabling concurrent reconciles for the applications…

[rumstead]

Closes #10952

Note on DCO:

If the DCO action in the integration test fails, one or more of your commits are not signed off. Please click on the Details link next to the DCO action for instructions on how to resolve this.

Checklist:

• Either (a) I've created an enhancement proposal and discussed it with the community, (b) this is a bug fix, or (c) this does not need to be in the release notes.
• The title of the PR states what changed and the related issues number (used for the release note).
• I've included "Closes [ISSUE #]" or "Fixes [ISSUE #]" in the description to automatically close the associated issue.
• I've updated both the CLI and UI to expose my feature, or I plan to submit a second PR with them.
• Does this PR require documentation updates?
• I've updated documentation as required by this PR.
• Optional. My organization is added to USERS.md.
• I have signed off all my commits as required by DCO
• I have written unit and/or e2e tests for my change. PRs without these are unlikely to be merged.
• My build is green (troubleshooting builds).

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 47.32% // Head: 47.33% // Increases project coverage by +0.00% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (1a41275) compared to base (8f0ef8d).
Patch coverage: 76.92% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 1a41275 differs from pull request most recent head 383f7d5. Consider uploading reports for the commit 383f7d5 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #11881   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   47.32%   47.33%           
=======================================
  Files         245      246    +1     
  Lines       41545    41558   +13     
=======================================
+ Hits        19661    19671   +10     
- Misses      19903    19906    +3     
  Partials     1981     1981           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...cationset/controllers/applicationset_controller.go	61.26% <0.00%> (-0.20%)	⬇️
applicationset/utils/keylock.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[rumstead]

Locking on the repo URL doesnt help too much if you have a monorepo where the config files for your app live. It would make more sense to checkout and lock based on something like <app set name>/<repo URL>/