Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: fix some github actions warnings #2375

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 8, 2022

Conversation

thomas-riccardi
Copy link
Contributor

@thomas-riccardi thomas-riccardi commented Oct 26, 2022

superseeds #1973 and #2251

Checklist:

  • Either (a) I've created an enhancement proposal and discussed it with the community, (b) this is a bug fix, or (c) this is a chore.
  • The title of the PR is (a) conventional with a list of types and scopes found here, (b) states what changed, and (c) suffixes the related issues number. E.g. "fix(controller): Updates such and such. Fixes #1234".
  • I've signed my commits with DCO
  • I have written unit and/or e2e tests for my change. PRs without these are unlikely to be merged.
  • My builds are green. Try syncing with master if they are not.
  • My organization is added to USERS.md.

@thomas-riccardi thomas-riccardi mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2022
6 tasks
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 26, 2022

Go Published Test Results

1 778 tests   1 778 ✔️  2m 30s ⏱️
   101 suites         0 💤
       1 files           0

Results for commit 0fae479.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 26, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 82.76% // Head: 82.76% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (0fae479) compared to base (381feea).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2375   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.76%   82.76%           
=======================================
  Files         121      121           
  Lines       18536    18536           
=======================================
  Hits        15341    15341           
  Misses       2410     2410           
  Partials      785      785           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 26, 2022

E2E Tests Published Test Results

    2 files      2 suites   1h 31m 51s ⏱️
  89 tests   83 ✔️ 3 💤 3
182 runs  173 ✔️ 6 💤 3

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 0fae479.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@zachaller zachaller self-requested a review October 27, 2022 02:31
@zachaller zachaller added the ready-for-review Ready for final review label Oct 27, 2022
@zachaller zachaller added the hacktoberfest-accepted Accepted Hacktoberfest contribution label Oct 28, 2022
The codecov/codecov-action api didn't change with v3.
Node.js version was updated from 12 to 16, fixing deprecation warning.

See: https://github.blog/changelog/2022-09-22-github-actions-all-actions-will-begin-running-on-node16-instead-of-node12/

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <thomas@deepomatic.com>
…ifacts from another workflow

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <thomas@deepomatic.com>
since v2 of EnricoMi/publish-unit-test-result-action:
warning:
Option FILES is deprecated, please use JUNIT_FILES instead!

all files are junit format, and are all named junit.xml

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <thomas@deepomatic.com>
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 31, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@zachaller zachaller merged commit 244b497 into argoproj:master Nov 8, 2022
@thomas-riccardi thomas-riccardi deleted the cleanup-actions-ci branch November 8, 2022 16:59
jandersen-plaid pushed a commit to jandersen-plaid/argo-rollouts that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2022
* bump codecov/codecov-action: v2 to v3

The codecov/codecov-action api didn't change with v3.
Node.js version was updated from 12 to 16, fixing deprecation warning.

See: https://github.blog/changelog/2022-09-22-github-actions-all-actions-will-begin-running-on-node16-instead-of-node12/

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <thomas@deepomatic.com>

* explain why we can't use native actions/download-artifact: we get artifacts from another workflow

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <thomas@deepomatic.com>

* fix publish test result warning

since v2 of EnricoMi/publish-unit-test-result-action:
warning:
Option FILES is deprecated, please use JUNIT_FILES instead!

all files are junit format, and are all named junit.xml

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <thomas@deepomatic.com>

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <thomas@deepomatic.com>
jandersen-plaid pushed a commit to jandersen-plaid/argo-rollouts that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2022
* bump codecov/codecov-action: v2 to v3

The codecov/codecov-action api didn't change with v3.
Node.js version was updated from 12 to 16, fixing deprecation warning.

See: https://github.blog/changelog/2022-09-22-github-actions-all-actions-will-begin-running-on-node16-instead-of-node12/

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <thomas@deepomatic.com>

* explain why we can't use native actions/download-artifact: we get artifacts from another workflow

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <thomas@deepomatic.com>

* fix publish test result warning

since v2 of EnricoMi/publish-unit-test-result-action:
warning:
Option FILES is deprecated, please use JUNIT_FILES instead!

all files are junit format, and are all named junit.xml

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <thomas@deepomatic.com>

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <thomas@deepomatic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hacktoberfest-accepted Accepted Hacktoberfest contribution ready-for-review Ready for final review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants