Skip to content

Conversation

@axic
Copy link
Contributor

@axic axic commented Apr 23, 2021

Part of #7259.

Prior to this half of the codebase used explicit deleted copy constructors, the others used boost::noncopyable. I do not care which approach we take, but would prefer we follow a single one and not a mix as of today.

Disclaimer: I did this a while back, but felt never is a good time submitting more refactorings 😬

Prior to this half of the codebase used explicit deleted copy constructors, the others used boost::noncopyable.
@cameel cameel merged commit 173a511 into develop Apr 23, 2021
@cameel cameel deleted the noncopyable branch April 23, 2021 20:38
@chriseth
Copy link
Contributor

My personal take is that if you need to add a comment, it is probably not the best approach.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants