Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Making executor consider all pending pods as requiring resource #260

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

JamesMurkin
Copy link
Contributor

Currently we consider pods requiring resource as:

  • Those running on "processing nodes"
  • Those that are "managed" by Armada and not assigned a node (i.e Pending)

The issue with this is that pods that are pending and not "managed" are not considered by Armada

So Armada keeps scheduling pods to take up the space this pending pod wants to use

This change should make it easier for non-Armada pods to get on the cluster (Pending -> Scheduled)

  • As we now leave space for it to get on

JamesMurkin and others added 5 commits November 28, 2019 11:22
Currently we consider pods requiring resource as:
 - Those running on "processing nodes"
 - Those that are "managed" by Armada and not assigned a node (i.e Pending)

The issue with this is that pods that are pending and not "managed" are not considered by Armada

So Armada keeps scheduling pods to take up the space this pending pod wants to use

This change should make it easier for non-Armada pods to get on the cluster (Pending -> Scheduled)
 - As we now leave space for it to get on
@jimbobby5
Copy link
Contributor

Closing old PR

@jimbobby5 jimbobby5 closed this Oct 13, 2020
@jimbobby5 jimbobby5 deleted the executor-respect-pending branch February 13, 2021 14:12
svc-gh-ghzonetrans-p pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
d80tb7 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
* fix test

* lint

Co-authored-by: Christopher Martin <Chris.Martin@gresearch.co.uk>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants