You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 14, 2018. It is now read-only.
After talks with @yishaigalatzer it turns out the activator is pretty heavy weight and not worth the investment in creating TagHelpers. We should remove the current functionality of accepting dependencies in the constructor.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
- We now rely on Activator.CreateInstance to instantiate TagHelpers.
- Added test to validate throwing.
- Removed existing tests that expected the constructor injection behavior.
#1303
- We now rely on Activator.CreateInstance to instantiate TagHelpers.
- Added test to validate throwing.
- Removed existing tests that expected the constructor injection behavior.
#1303
- We now new up TagHelper's, requiring them to have parameterless constructors.
- Added test to validate throwing.
- Removed existing tests that expected the constructor injection behavior.
#1303
- We now new up TagHelper's, requiring them to have parameterless constructors.
- Added test to validate throwing.
- Removed existing tests that expected the constructor injection behavior.
#1303
- We now new up TagHelper's, requiring them to have parameterless constructors.
- Added test to validate throwing.
- Removed existing tests that expected the constructor injection behavior.
#1303
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
After talks with @yishaigalatzer it turns out the activator is pretty heavy weight and not worth the investment in creating
TagHelper
s. We should remove the current functionality of accepting dependencies in the constructor.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: