Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

true_coverage module in innuca recipe #193

Open
cimendes opened this issue Feb 7, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

true_coverage module in innuca recipe #193

cimendes opened this issue Feb 7, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working recipe

Comments

@cimendes
Copy link
Member

cimendes commented Feb 7, 2019

Currently, the true_coverage module requires a species to be passed on as an argument, but a scheme is not available for every species. When this happens, the pipeline breaks with an error. This makes the innuca recipe unusable for other organisms. I suggest that when a species is set as Null, for this component to be bypassed. Otherwise, when the species is not included, a sys.exit is launched with an error code that then we can pass on to the nextflow component for it to be ignored. The last solution is more clean, in my opinion, but requires a PR in rematch's code.

@cimendes cimendes added bug Something isn't working recipe labels Feb 7, 2019
@cimendes cimendes self-assigned this Feb 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working recipe
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant