-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[red-knot] rename {Class,Module,Function} => {Class,Module,Function}Literal #13873
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d613375
[red-knot] rename {Class,Module,Function} => {Class,Module,Function}L…
sharkdp c4c447d
Rename LiteralTypeKind => CondensedDisplayTypeKind
sharkdp 9fe1c90
Rename corresponding methods
sharkdp 97c28f5
Update crates/red_knot_python_semantic/src/types/display.rs
sharkdp 70a1ca0
Remove the need for is_class_literal
sharkdp 3505e7a
Introduce more Type::is_xyz variants
sharkdp File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: we could add
is_function_literal()
andis_class_literal
methods toType
, and use them hereThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This method does not exist 😄. I could do
assert!(ty.into_function_literal_type().is_some())
, but I don't think that's much better than matching on the variant?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know! Sorry for being unclear. I'm suggesting we could add
Type::is_function_literal()
andType::is_class_literal()
methods to theType
enum, for consistency with our existingType::is_unbound
andType::is_never
methods. It doesn't have to be done in this PR, but it also might as well if we're touching these lines anyway ;)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, sorry. I misread.
is_function_literal
does not exist, butis_class_literal
exists. It does something different from just matching againstType::ClassLiteral
though 🙈So if we want to do this properly, I guess we would have to rename the existing
is_class_literal
function...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We're well down the renaming rabbit hole now. May as well 😆
It seems like the question the existing
is_class_literal
method is actually trying to answer is "Is the type a subtype ofInstance(builtins.type)
?". Maybe we could try to just get rid of it and makeis_subtype_of
work correctly forInstance(builtins.type)
, so that it recognises allType::ClassLiteral
s as subtypesThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did that now.