Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[
ruff
] Parenthesize arguments toint
when removingint
would change semantics inunnecessary-cast-to-int
(RUF046
) #15277[
ruff
] Parenthesize arguments toint
when removingint
would change semantics inunnecessary-cast-to-int
(RUF046
) #15277Changes from all commits
a3f34cd
cef146f
febee96
cf826b7
1a78ab9
f06cb77
d7ddf2e
a11d469
99a6db2
9dcb4d6
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add couple of test cases for subscript expressions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As far as I can tell, type inference is not robust enough to ever apply this rule to a subscript. So I can't write a test that would trigger this branch. On the other hand, I think I should leave this match arm in case type inference is later improved to cover this case.