Add checks for dataclasses

crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/RUF008.py

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+from dataclasses import dataclass, field
+
+KNOWINGLY_MUTABLE_DEFAULT = []
+
+
+@dataclass()
+class A:
+    mutable_default: list[int] = []
+    without_annotation = []
+    ignored_via_comment: list[int] = []  # noqa: RUF008
+    correct_code: list[int] = KNOWINGLY_MUTABLE_DEFAULT
+    perfectly_fine: list[int] = field(default_factory=list)
+
+
+@dataclass
+class B:
+    mutable_default: list[int] = []
+    without_annotation = []
+    ignored_via_comment: list[int] = []  # noqa: RUF008
+    correct_code: list[int] = KNOWINGLY_MUTABLE_DEFAULT
+    perfectly_fine: list[int] = field(default_factory=list)

crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/RUF009.py

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+from dataclasses import dataclass
+from typing import NamedTuple
+
+
+def default_function() -> list[int]:
+    return []
+
+
+class ImmutableType(NamedTuple):
+    something: int = 8
+
+
+@dataclass()
+class A:
+    hidden_mutable_default: list[int] = default_function()
+
+
+DEFAULT_IMMUTABLETYPE_FOR_ALL_DATACLASSES = ImmutableType(40)
+DEFAULT_A_FOR_ALL_DATACLASSES = A([1, 2, 3])
+
+
+@dataclass
+class B:
+    hidden_mutable_default: list[int] = default_function()
+    another_dataclass: A = A()
+    not_optimal: ImmutableType = ImmutableType(20)
+    good_variant: ImmutableType = DEFAULT_IMMUTABLETYPE_FOR_ALL_DATACLASSES
+    okay_variant: A = DEFAULT_A_FOR_ALL_DATACLASSES

crates/ruff/src/checkers/ast/mod.rs

@@ -816,6 +816,24 @@ where
                     flake8_pie::rules::non_unique_enums(self, stmt, body);
                 }
 
+                if self.settings.rules.any_enabled(&[
+                    Rule::MutableDataclassDefault,
+                    Rule::FunctionCallInDataclassDefaultArgument,
+                ]) && ruff::rules::is_dataclass(self, decorator_list)
+                {
+                    if self.settings.rules.enabled(Rule::MutableDataclassDefault) {
+                        ruff::rules::mutable_dataclass_default(self, body);
+                    }
+
+                    if self
+                        .settings
+                        .rules
+                        .enabled(Rule::FunctionCallInDataclassDefaultArgument)
+                    {
+                        ruff::rules::function_call_in_dataclass_defaults(self, body);
+                    }
+                }
+
                 self.check_builtin_shadowing(name, stmt, false);
 
                 for expr in bases {

crates/ruff/src/codes.rs

@@ -700,6 +700,8 @@ pub fn code_to_rule(linter: Linter, code: &str) -> Option<Rule> {
         (Ruff, "005") => Rule::CollectionLiteralConcatenation,
         (Ruff, "006") => Rule::AsyncioDanglingTask,
         (Ruff, "007") => Rule::PairwiseOverZipped,
+        (Ruff, "008") => Rule::MutableDataclassDefault,
+        (Ruff, "009") => Rule::FunctionCallInDataclassDefaultArgument,
         (Ruff, "100") => Rule::UnusedNOQA,
 
         // flake8-django

crates/ruff/src/registry.rs

@@ -644,6 +644,8 @@ ruff_macros::register_rules!(
     rules::ruff::rules::AsyncioDanglingTask,
     rules::ruff::rules::UnusedNOQA,
     rules::ruff::rules::PairwiseOverZipped,
+    rules::ruff::rules::MutableDataclassDefault,
+    rules::ruff::rules::FunctionCallInDataclassDefaultArgument,
     // flake8-django
     rules::flake8_django::rules::DjangoNullableModelStringField,
     rules::flake8_django::rules::DjangoLocalsInRenderFunction,

crates/ruff/src/rules/ruff/mod.rs

@@ -152,4 +152,16 @@ mod tests {
         assert_yaml_snapshot!(diagnostics);
         Ok(())
     }
+
+    #[test_case(Rule::MutableDataclassDefault, Path::new("RUF008.py"); "RUF008")]
+    #[test_case(Rule::FunctionCallInDataclassDefaultArgument, Path::new("RUF009.py"); "RUF009")]
+    fn mutable_defaults(rule_code: Rule, path: &Path) -> Result<()> {
+        let snapshot = format!("{}_{}", rule_code.noqa_code(), path.to_string_lossy());
+        let diagnostics = test_path(
+            Path::new("ruff").join(path).as_path(),
+            &settings::Settings::for_rule(rule_code),
+        )?;
+        assert_yaml_snapshot!(snapshot, diagnostics);
+        Ok(())
+    }
 }

crates/ruff/src/rules/ruff/rules/mod.rs

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 mod ambiguous_unicode_character;
 mod asyncio_dangling_task;
 mod collection_literal_concatenation;
+mod mutable_defaults_in_dataclass_fields;
 mod pairwise_over_zipped;
 mod unused_noqa;
 
@@ -12,6 +13,10 @@ pub use asyncio_dangling_task::{asyncio_dangling_task, AsyncioDanglingTask};
 pub use collection_literal_concatenation::{
     collection_literal_concatenation, CollectionLiteralConcatenation,
 };
+pub use mutable_defaults_in_dataclass_fields::{
+    function_call_in_dataclass_defaults, is_dataclass, mutable_dataclass_default,
+    FunctionCallInDataclassDefaultArgument, MutableDataclassDefault,
+};
 pub use pairwise_over_zipped::{pairwise_over_zipped, PairwiseOverZipped};
 pub use unused_noqa::{UnusedCodes, UnusedNOQA};
 

crates/ruff/src/rules/ruff/rules/mutable_defaults_in_dataclass_fields.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
+use rustpython_parser::ast::{Expr, ExprKind, Stmt, StmtKind};
+
+use ruff_diagnostics::{Diagnostic, Violation};
+use ruff_macros::{derive_message_formats, violation};
+use ruff_python_ast::{call_path::compose_call_path, helpers::map_callable, types::Range};
+use ruff_python_semantic::context::Context;
+
+use crate::checkers::ast::Checker;
+
+/// ## What it does
+/// Checks for mutable default values in dataclasses without the use of
+/// `dataclasses.field`.
+///
+/// ## Why is it bad?
+/// Mutable default values share state across all instances of the dataclass,
+/// while not being obvious. This can lead to bugs when the attributes are
+/// changed in one instance, as those changes will unexpectedly affect all
+/// other instances.
+///
+/// ## Examples:
+/// ```python
+/// from dataclasses import dataclass
+///
+/// @dataclass
+/// class A:
+///     mutable_default: list[int] = []
+/// ```
+///
+/// Use instead:
+/// ```python
+/// from dataclasses import dataclass, field
+///
+/// @dataclass
+/// class A:
+///     mutable_default: list[int] = field(default_factory=list)
+/// ```
+///
+/// Alternatively, if you _want_ shared behaviour, make it more obvious
+/// by assigning to a module-level variable:
+/// ```python
+/// from dataclasses import dataclass
+///
+/// I_KNOW_THIS_IS_SHARED_STATE = [1, 2, 3, 4]
+///
+/// @dataclass
+/// class A:
+///     mutable_default: list[int] = I_KNOW_THIS_IS_SHARED_STATE
+/// ```
+#[violation]
+pub struct MutableDataclassDefault;
+
+impl Violation for MutableDataclassDefault {
+    #[derive_message_formats]
+    fn message(&self) -> String {
+        format!("Do not use mutable default values for dataclass attributes")
+    }
+}
+
+/// ## What it does
+/// Checks for function calls in dataclass defaults.
+///
+/// ## Why is it bad?
+/// Function calls are only performed once, at definition time. The returned
+/// value is then reused by all instances of the dataclass.
+///
+/// ## Examples:
+/// ```python
+/// from dataclasses import dataclass
+///
+/// def creating_list() -> list[]:
+///     return [1, 2, 3, 4]
+///
+/// @dataclass
+/// class A:
+///     mutable_default: list[int] = creating_list()
+///
+/// # also:
+///
+/// @dataclass
+/// class B:
+///     also_mutable_default_but_sneakier: A = A()
+/// ```
+///
+/// Use instead:
+/// ```python
+/// from dataclasses import dataclass, field
+///
+/// def creating_list() -> list[]:
+///     return [1, 2, 3, 4]
+///
+/// @dataclass
+/// class A:
+///     mutable_default: list[int] = field(default_factory=creating_list)
+///
+/// @dataclass
+/// class B:
+///     also_mutable_default_but_sneakier: A = field(default_factory=A)
+/// ```
+///
+/// Alternatively, if you _want_ the shared behaviour, make it more obvious
+/// by assigning it to a module-level variable:
+/// ```python
+/// from dataclasses import dataclass
+///
+/// def creating_list() -> list[]:
+///     return [1, 2, 3, 4]
+///
+/// I_KNOW_THIS_IS_SHARED_STATE = creating_list()
+///
+/// @dataclass
+/// class A:
+///     mutable_default: list[int] = I_KNOW_THIS_IS_SHARED_STATE
+/// ```
+#[violation]
+pub struct FunctionCallInDataclassDefaultArgument {
+    pub name: Option<String>,
+}
+
+impl Violation for FunctionCallInDataclassDefaultArgument {
+    #[derive_message_formats]
+    fn message(&self) -> String {
+        let FunctionCallInDataclassDefaultArgument { name } = self;
+        if let Some(name) = name {
+            format!("Do not perform function call `{name}` in dataclass defaults")
+        } else {
+            format!("Do not perform function call in dataclass defaults")
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+fn is_mutable_expr(expr: &Expr) -> bool {
+    matches!(
+        &expr.node,
+        ExprKind::List { .. }
+            | ExprKind::Dict { .. }
+            | ExprKind::Set { .. }
+            | ExprKind::ListComp { .. }
+            | ExprKind::DictComp { .. }
+            | ExprKind::SetComp { .. }
+    )
+}
+
+const ALLOWED_FUNCS: &[&[&str]] = &[&["dataclasses", "field"]];
+
+fn is_allowed_func(context: &Context, func: &Expr) -> bool {
+    context.resolve_call_path(func).map_or(false, |call_path| {
+        ALLOWED_FUNCS
+            .iter()
+            .any(|target| call_path.as_slice() == *target)
+    })
+}
+
+/// RUF009
+pub fn function_call_in_dataclass_defaults(checker: &mut Checker, body: &[Stmt]) {
+    for statement in body {
+        if let StmtKind::AnnAssign {
+            value: Some(expr), ..
+        } = &statement.node
+        {
+            if let ExprKind::Call { func, .. } = &expr.node {
+                if !is_allowed_func(&checker.ctx, func) {
+                    checker.diagnostics.push(Diagnostic::new(
+                        FunctionCallInDataclassDefaultArgument {
+                            name: compose_call_path(func),
+                        },
+                        Range::from(expr),
+                    ));
+                }
+            }
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+/// RUF008
+pub fn mutable_dataclass_default(checker: &mut Checker, body: &[Stmt]) {
+    for statement in body {
+        if let StmtKind::AnnAssign {
+            value: Some(value), ..
+        }
+        | StmtKind::Assign { value, .. } = &statement.node
+        {
+            if is_mutable_expr(value) {
+                checker
+                    .diagnostics
+                    .push(Diagnostic::new(MutableDataclassDefault, Range::from(value)));
+            }
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+pub fn is_dataclass(checker: &Checker, decorator_list: &[Expr]) -> bool {
+    decorator_list.iter().any(|decorator| {
+        checker
+            .ctx
+            .resolve_call_path(map_callable(decorator))
+            .map_or(false, |call_path| {
+                call_path.as_slice() == ["dataclasses", "dataclass"]
+            })
+    })
+}

crates/ruff/src/rules/ruff/snapshots/ruff__rules__ruff__tests__RUF008_RUF008.py.snap

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+---
+source: crates/ruff/src/rules/ruff/mod.rs
+expression: diagnostics
+---
+- kind:
+    name: MutableDataclassDefault
+    body: Do not use mutable default values for dataclass attributes
+    suggestion: ~
+    fixable: false
+  location:
+    row: 8
+    column: 33
+  end_location:
+    row: 8
+    column: 35
+  fix:
+    edits: []
+  parent: ~
+- kind:
+    name: MutableDataclassDefault
+    body: Do not use mutable default values for dataclass attributes
+    suggestion: ~
+    fixable: false
+  location:
+    row: 9
+    column: 25
+  end_location:
+    row: 9
+    column: 27
+  fix:
+    edits: []
+  parent: ~
+- kind:
+    name: MutableDataclassDefault
+    body: Do not use mutable default values for dataclass attributes
+    suggestion: ~
+    fixable: false
+  location:
+    row: 17
+    column: 33
+  end_location:
+    row: 17
+    column: 35
+  fix:
+    edits: []
+  parent: ~
+- kind:
+    name: MutableDataclassDefault
+    body: Do not use mutable default values for dataclass attributes
+    suggestion: ~
+    fixable: false
+  location:
+    row: 18
+    column: 25
+  end_location:
+    row: 18
+    column: 27
+  fix:
+    edits: []
+  parent: ~
+