refactor(core, sequencer)!: require that bridge unlock address always be set #1339
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Requires that
astria.protocol.v1alpha1.BridgeUnlockAction.bridge_address
is always.Background
Before this patch, the transaction signer containing the bridge unlock action was used as the bridge address if the bridge address was not set. This means that setting the bridge address to the signer or leaving it unset resultes in the same behavior. This patch makes the bridge address a requirement so that a bridge unlock is easier to understand at a first glance (i.e. without needing to remember implementation or spec details), and because two separate actions should not lead to the same result.
Changes
astria.protocol.v1alpha1.BridgeUnlockAction.bridge_address
a required field.Testing
Tests have been updated to reflect this change: explicitly setteing the bridge address to the signer makes those tests pass again that relied on the implicit behaviour.
Breaking Changelist
This is a protocl breaking change because newer sequencers will reject bridge unlock actions without a bridge address.
Related Issues
Closes #1338