Documentation of Freetext constraint #577
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ManonMarchand
force-pushed
the
docs-edit-freetext-constraint
branch
from
21d2290 to
8c7432a
Compare
ManonMarchand
force-pushed
the
docs-edit-freetext-constraint
branch
from
8c7432a to
b4def66
Compare
msdemlei
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2024
|
minor comment: @ManonMarchand - please use branches for PRs in your fork rather than in the main repo. |
|
Sure, sorry! |
bsipocz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2024
Documentation of Freetext constraint
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Freetext does not expect a tuple of strings, but multiple string arguments, I know it's nitpicky but I'll teach the use of it soon and I'd expect this to be a bit confusing for the students if we don't change.
Edit: there were other occurences