New concept: "energetic particles", not "solar energetic particles"

[ace91024]

Name the concept in question
Which concept is this suggestion about? Please provide the numeric ID or URI for the concept as well.

Describe the change
Should the concept be moved to another location within the hierarchy? Where and why?
Should the concept be renamed? Why?
Should this concept be merged with another concept? Which concept and why?

Please include any additional comments/feedback

[ace91024]

how do I logout of this website?

[BartlettAstro]

@ace91024 you are correct, not all energetic particles originate in the Sun. With what kind of energetic particles are you working? We need a little more context to help you identify an appropriate existing concept or add a concept that should be included but is not already.

You initially wrote
"energetic particles" is now just Solar energetic particles. My energetic particles are not Solar. I don't see how to use this website.

[BartlettAstro]

"Solar energetic particles" is UAT concept 1491

[ace91024]

Hi: We are studying Anomalous Cosmic Rays. Best, Alan From: Jennifer Lynn Bartlett ***@***.***> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 5:49 PM To: astrothesaurus/UAT ***@***.***> Cc: Cummings, Alan C. (Alan) ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [astrothesaurus/UAT] New concept: "energetic particles", not "solar energetic particles" (Issue #447) "Solar energetic particles" is UAT concept 1491 — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#447 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BKZVTMAY3NVDABI76CTVCO3ZWIZA5AVCNFSM6AAAAABNEU3AIKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNBXG4YDQOBQGE>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.******@***.***>>