Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add messageId property #751

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 22, 2022

Conversation

WaleedAshraf
Copy link
Contributor


title: "add messageId property"


Related issue(s):
closes #458

spec/asyncapi.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Lukasz Gornicki <lpgornicki@gmail.com>
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 13, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

spec/asyncapi.md Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/asyncapi.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@smoya smoya mentioned this pull request Apr 14, 2022
55 tasks
@smoya
Copy link
Member

smoya commented Apr 20, 2022

@dalelane @derberg we need your review here in order to proceed and merge the rest of the approved PRs on this new feature. 🙏 Thanks

@smoya
Copy link
Member

smoya commented Apr 21, 2022

@dalelane we need your aproval here. Thanks!

@smoya
Copy link
Member

smoya commented Apr 22, 2022

All PR's have been merged. Proceeding with this one 🎉

@smoya
Copy link
Member

smoya commented Apr 22, 2022

/rtm

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot merged commit e285fb4 into asyncapi:2022-04-release Apr 22, 2022
@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.4.0-2022-04-release.3 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@fmvilas
Copy link
Member

fmvilas commented Apr 25, 2022

🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants