-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What is the difference between minimap and minimap-plus #709
Conversation
Marking event listeners as passive, indicates that the callback will never call `event.preventDefault()`. This can improve scolling performance in many cases. For more information on passive event listeners see: https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2016/06/passive-event-listeners
🐎 Make event listeners passive
Co-authored-by: Derek Kramer <derek.kramer88@gmail.com>
Fix the order of config
This will prevent the very long lines to break minimap when softwrap is not enabled.
This allows skipping the frames if the browser is busy doing other things, and it will improve the overall experience
This fixes the previous commit which did not cancel animation frame
From what I understand Minimap is abandoned. It seems that @abe33 did not answer my emails, issues, mentions, etc. Unfortunately, they have been disappeared from the internet. Therefore, I had to make a separate package to improve the minimap. See #700
Minimap plus is much faster. It uses desynchronized canvas for rending, passive listeners for scrolling, and many other improvements that make minimap-plus the better package. |
feat: Faster canvas by using desynchronized: true
Hi, what is the improvement for minimap-plus campared to minimap? I am using the minimap to align my reads to my assembly, it is so slow. Will the minimap-plus be faster?
Thanks!