-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
License file not recognized by package website #68
Comments
All three should work, but I believe there's currently a problem with the backend where it's not recognizing any license files. /cc @lee-dohm |
We know about the problem and I have a manual process that can go through and clean things up as a workaround for now. It's not a 100% thing, kind of intermittent. The website supports all three versions and even will do its best to detect if you only specify the license by name in the |
+1. I noticed this recently too. |
+1 This is occurring on https://atom.io/packages/linter-cookstyle as well. I have tried renaming |
As I stated above, this isn't an issue with the name of the file, it is an intermittent website issue. |
Same issues here https://atom.io/packages/language-dts |
Ran the batch process to update all the packages. Everyone's license should be there now. |
hi there! My package likewise seems to be having this issue https://atom.io/packages/atom-ember-component |
Can't this intermittent website issue get fixed? |
Same problem here. Package.json with license, github repository with license, but atom package page is missing license. Check https://atom.io/packages/highlight-cursor-line |
Problem solved today. I think atom package site have a delay to update license. |
We've deployed some updates that should resolve the problem. As you publish a new package (or a new version of an existing package), atom.io should correctly display your package's license. We've also backfilled the license info on atom.io for all previously published packages. If you continue to observe this problem, please let us know. 🙇 |
I've already created an issue for
package-generator
, but this is probably the more appropriate place for this issue:Ideally, the website would work with
LICENSE
,LICENSE.md
and maybeLICENSE.txt
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: