Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ADM-658:[backend]fix: The analysis days in csv file should sum the or… #777

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 6, 2023

Conversation

mikeyangyun
Copy link

…iginal status days which map to analysis

Summary

Given User finish the configuration of heartbeat with at least one column map to analysis state

When click export board data button to get report

And when user export the board data

Then The analysis days in csv file is 0

Before

The analysis days in csv file is 0

After

The analysis days in csv file should sum the original status days which map to analysis

Note

Null

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Hi @mikeyangyun! 👋
Thank you for submitting a pull request! We appreciate your contribution and will review your changes as soon as possible.

Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (a4affb6) 4262 4262 100.00%
Head commit (5988136) 1980 (-2282) 1980 (-2282) 100.00% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#777) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Copy link
Collaborator

@guzhongren guzhongren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mikeyangyun mikeyangyun merged commit bd391f1 into main Dec 6, 2023
34 of 36 checks passed
@mikeyangyun mikeyangyun deleted the ADM-658 branch December 6, 2023 02:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants