-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Turbopack: use block_in_place for db reads #245
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
🔍 This pull request has been sent to HackerOne's PullRequest review team because our automation detected one or more changes with potential security impact or requires further evaluation. Experts are now being assigned to this review based on relevant expertise and will validate or dismiss any security findings accordingly and post their feedback as comments within this pull request. ⏱️ Latest scan covered changes up to commit 2d671e4 (latest) Check the status or cancel this secure code review here. |
14c4dc4 to
ce650a6
Compare
It doesn't have benefit as each block is already large as we merge small values together and medium size values are already large. This also gives the benefit that we do not need to recompress medium value blocks when doing compaction
ce650a6 to
c9f66b6
Compare
PullRequest network review has been cancelledYou can reactivate the code review job from the PullRequest dashboard - or - by adding [pr] to the title of this code review. |
🔄 This is a mirror of upstream PR #82531