Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct Autolab spelling #2055

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024
Merged

Correct Autolab spelling #2055

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024

Conversation

ndrewchen
Copy link
Contributor

@ndrewchen ndrewchen commented Jan 17, 2024

Summary

Summary generated by Reviewpad on 17 Jan 24 22:38 UTC

This pull request corrects the spelling of "Autolab" in the application layout file. The word is updated to "Autolab" instead of "AutoLab" to ensure consistency.

Description

Corrected miscapitalized spellings of Autolab.

Motivation and Context

Autolab should be spelled the same across the platform for professionalism and consistency.

How Has This Been Tested?

Cosmetic change, no tests needed.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • I have run rubocop and erblint for style check. If you haven't, run overcommit --install && overcommit --sign to use pre-commit hook for linting
  • My change requires a change to the documentation, which is located at Autolab Docs
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly, included in this PR

Other issues / help required

If unsure, feel free to submit first and we'll help you along.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The update made to the application involves ensuring consistent branding by changing the term "AutoLab" to "Autolab" across the user interface. This simple yet important change maintains uniformity in the application's branding.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/views/layouts/application.html.erb Renamed "AutoLab" to "Autolab" for brand consistency
.env.template, docs, spec/controllers Updated terminology and capitalized "Autolab" for consistency in comments, documentation, and test contexts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@reviewpad reviewpad bot requested a review from damianhxy January 17, 2024 22:38
@reviewpad reviewpad bot added small Pull request is small waiting-for-review labels Jan 17, 2024
Copy link
Member

@damianhxy damianhxy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Before
Screenshot 2024-01-17 at 17 43 30

After
Screenshot 2024-01-17 at 17 44 07

LGTM

@2002kevinhuang
Copy link

LGTM! 👍

@2002kevinhuang
Copy link

You should add a few unit tests for this new change as to ensure core functionality is not impacted. Please also consider internationalization for the non-English speaking autolab users.

@2002kevinhuang
Copy link

You should add a few unit tests for this new change as to ensure core functionality is not impacted. Please also consider internationalization for the non-English speaking autolab users.

^ AutoLab

@2002kevinhuang
Copy link

You should add a few unit tests for this new change as to ensure core functionality is not impacted. Please also consider internationalization for the non-English speaking autolab users.

^ AutoLab

^ Autolab

@damianhxy
Copy link
Member

damianhxy commented Jan 17, 2024

@coderabbitai are there any other misspellings of Autolab that was missed by this PR?

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2024

@damianhxy Based on the search conducted in the codebase, there are no instances of "Autolab" being misspelled in a way that differs from the correct casing. All occurrences of the term appear to be spelled correctly as "Autolab".

Analysis chain
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any misspellings of "Autolab" such as "AutoLab", "auto lab", "auto-lab", etc.
rg -i 'autolab' | rg -iv 'autolab'

Length of output: 32

Copy link
Member

@damianhxy damianhxy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are remaining misspellings in .gitignore and CONTRIBUTING.md

@ndrewchen
Copy link
Contributor Author

There are remaining misspellings in .gitignore and CONTRIBUTING.md

Fixed in previous commit 😄

Copy link
Member

@damianhxy damianhxy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Outstanding 👍

@damianhxy damianhxy added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into autolab:master with commit 306ebe5 Jan 18, 2024
6 checks passed
NicholasMy pushed a commit to UB-CSE-IT/Autolab that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2025
* Correct Autolab spelling

* Corrected additional misspellings of Autolab

* Corrected additional miscapitalizations

(cherry picked from commit 306ebe5)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
small Pull request is small
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants