Add case for migration with numa topology #5964
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: liang-cong-red-hat <lcong@redhat.com>
liang-cong-red-hat
force-pushed
the
add_case_migration_with_numa_topology
branch
from
7f25305 to
ea5a380
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Case ID: VIRT-301811
depends on pr avocado-framework/avocado-vt#4016
Test results:
Notes: For there is warning or error msg logged in guest dmesg during the migration, to test the whole process, so the test result ignore these dmesg msg.
(1/4) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.guest_numa_topology.migration_with_numa_topology.with_back_migration.without_postcopy.base_options.one_cluster_on_numa: STARTED
(1/4) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.guest_numa_topology.migration_with_numa_topology.with_back_migration.without_postcopy.base_options.one_cluster_on_numa: PASS (448.59 s)
(2/4) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.guest_numa_topology.migration_with_numa_topology.with_back_migration.without_postcopy.base_options.multi_cluster_on_numa: STARTED
(2/4) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.guest_numa_topology.migration_with_numa_topology.with_back_migration.without_postcopy.base_options.multi_cluster_on_numa: PASS (449.70 s)
(3/4) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.guest_numa_topology.migration_with_numa_topology.no_back_migration.without_postcopy.base_options.one_cluster_on_numa: STARTED
(3/4) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.guest_numa_topology.migration_with_numa_topology.no_back_migration.without_postcopy.base_options.one_cluster_on_numa: PASS (516.16 s)
(4/4) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.guest_numa_topology.migration_with_numa_topology.no_back_migration.without_postcopy.base_options.multi_cluster_on_numa: STARTED
(4/4) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.guest_numa_topology.migration_with_numa_topology.no_back_migration.without_postcopy.base_options.multi_cluster_on_numa: PASS (531.67 s)