fix(geo): update amplify config geo schema

[ashwinkumar6]

Description of changes

below is the ref for backend schema that generates geo amplifyOutputs

"geo": {
    "description": "Outputs manually specified by developers for use with frontend library",
    "type": "object",
    "additionalProperties": false,
    "properties": {
    "aws_region": {
        "description": "AWS Region of Amazon Location Service resources",
        "$ref": "#/$defs/aws_region"
    },
    "maps": {
        "description": "Maps from Amazon Location Service",
        "type": "object",
        "additionalProperties": false,
        "properties": {
        "items": {
            "type": "object",
            "additionalProperties": false,
            "propertyNames": {
            "description": "Amazon Location Service Map name",
            "type": "string"
            },
            "patternProperties": {
            ".*": {
                "$ref": "#/$defs/amazon_location_service_config"
            }
            }
        },
        "default": {
            "type": "string"
        }
        },
        "required": ["items", "default"]
    },
    "search_indices": {
        "description": "Location search (search by places, addresses, coordinates)",
        "type": "object",
        "additionalProperties": false,
        "properties": {
        "items": {
            "type": "array",
            "uniqueItems": true,
            "minItems": 1,
            "items": {
            "description": "Actual search name",
            "type": "string"
            }
        },
        "default": {
            "type": "string"
        }
        },
        "required": ["items", "default"]
    },
    "geofence_collections": {
        "description": "Geofencing (visualize virtual perimeters)",
        "type": "object",
        "additionalProperties": false,
        "properties": {
            "items": {
            "type": "array",
            "uniqueItems": true,
            "minItems": 1,
            "items": {
                "description": "Geofence name",
                "type": "string"
            }
            },
            "default": {
            "type": "string"
            }
        },
        "required": ["items", "default"]
    }
    },
    "required": ["aws_region"]
},

Geo.map.items (amazon_location_service_config from the config above)

"amazon_location_service_config": {
    "type": "object",
    "additionalProperties": false,
    "properties": {
    "style": { // ====> only 'style' present here, no 'name'
        "description": "Map style",
        "type": "string"
    }
    }
}

amplify_outputs.json

"geo": {
  "aws_region": "us-west-2",
  "maps": {
    "items": {
      "myMap": {
        "style": "VectorEsriNavigation"
      }
    },
    "default": "myMap"
  },
  "geofence_collections": {
    "default": "myGeofenceCollection",
    "items": [
      "myGeofenceCollection"
    ]
  },
  "search_indices": {
    "default": "myPlaceIndex",
    "items": [
      "myPlaceIndex"
    ]
  }
}

Description of how you validated changes

Validated this change works with the geo gen2 cdk construct mentioned in docs

Checklist

• PR description included
• yarn test passes
• Tests are changed or added

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

[ashwinkumar6]

Option 1(less strict): keep type same as resource config. Similar to other categories

	maps?: {
		items: Record<string, unknown>;
		default: string;
	};

Option 2(more strict): remove name keep existing structure

	maps?: {
		items: Record<string, { style: string }>;
		default: string;
	};

[ashwinkumar6]

Going with option1, please feel free to comment otherwise

[jimblanc]

Is there a reason not to go with option 2? Seems like the cleaner solution

[ashika112]

Is there a reason we would want to do that? So the actual resource config itself is less stricter than what we had in outputsConfig and wondering if it would make sense to keep the same (consistency) since this is compiled down to ResourceConfig at the end.

[elorzafe]

Thanks @ashwinkumar6