Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add ignore for RUSTSEC-2017-0008 #190

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024
Merged

chore: add ignore for RUSTSEC-2017-0008 #190

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

grant0417
Copy link
Member

@grant0417 grant0417 commented Dec 4, 2024

Description of changes:

  • This PR adds an ignore for RUSTSEC-2017-0008 which is currently causing the cargo deny checks to fail.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@grant0417 grant0417 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 4, 2024 18:36
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 15.51%. Comparing base (af51edf) to head (5c33b0b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #190   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   15.51%   15.51%           
=======================================
  Files        1502     1502           
  Lines      134029   134029           
  Branches   134029   134029           
=======================================
+ Hits        20795    20796    +1     
+ Misses     112037   112035    -2     
- Partials     1197     1198    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@grant0417 grant0417 merged commit 73e2efa into main Dec 4, 2024
20 checks passed
@grant0417 grant0417 deleted the deny-serial branch December 4, 2024 19:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants