Merge branch 'master' into pr/cross-record

patches/README.md

@@ -27,3 +27,17 @@ $ time node_modules/.bin/lerna exec pwd
 lerna success exec Executed command in 219 packages: "pwd"
         1.11 real         0.99 user         0.82 sys
 ```
+
+## jsii-rosetta+1.28.0.patch
+
+jsii-rosetta uses multiple worker threads by default to speed up sample extraction.
+It defaults to spawning workers equal to half the number of cores. On extremely
+powerful build machines (e.g., CodeBuild X2_LARGE compute with 72 vCPUs),
+the high number of workers (36) results in thrash and high memory usage due to
+duplicate loads of source files. This was causing the v2 builds to fail with:
+"FATAL ERROR: NewSpace::Rebalance Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory"
+
+The patch simply limits the top number of worker threads to an arbitrarily-chosen
+maximum limit of 16. We could simply disable the worker threads, but this takes much
+longer to process. With single-threading, rosetta takes ~35 minutes to extract samples
+from the CDK; with 16 workers, it takes ~3.5 minutes.

patches/jsii-rosetta+1.28.0.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+diff --git a/node_modules/jsii-rosetta/lib/commands/extract.js b/node_modules/jsii-rosetta/lib/commands/extract.js
+index e695ea9..539038e 100644
+--- a/node_modules/jsii-rosetta/lib/commands/extract.js
++++ b/node_modules/jsii-rosetta/lib/commands/extract.js
+@@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ exports.singleThreadedTranslateAll = singleThreadedTranslateAll;
+ async function workerBasedTranslateAll(worker, snippets, includeCompilerDiagnostics) {
+     // Use about half the advertised cores because hyperthreading doesn't seem to help that
+     // much (on my machine, using more than half the cores actually makes it slower).
+-    const N = Math.max(1, Math.ceil(os.cpus().length / 2));
++    // Cap to a reasonable top-level limit to prevent thrash on machines with many, many cores.
++    const N = Math.min(16, Math.max(1, Math.ceil(os.cpus().length / 2)));
+     const snippetArr = Array.from(snippets);
+     const groups = util_1.divideEvenly(N, snippetArr);
+     logging.info(`Translating ${snippetArr.length} snippets using ${groups.length} workers`);