-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(appsync): revert to allow resolver creation from data source #12973
Conversation
@p0wl @asnaseer-resilient I thinks it is best to keep both functionality as PIPELINE resolvers should be tied to a GraphqlApi as well |
Nice! Thanks!! |
Anything that I/we can do to get this merged? This is blocking us quite a bit. |
I think we are just waiting on a maintainer to accept these changes. @MrArnoldPalmer this seems like a |
Hey @BryanPan342, added a question to the original issue #12635 (comment). Respond here or there, either way. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💯 ty @BryanPan342 !
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
) * Revert to old behavior of allowing a data source to create a resolver as UNIT resolvers stem from data sources. * Maintaining new behavior of having `GraphqlApi` create resolvers as PIPELINE resolvers stem from the `GraphqlApi` itself Fixes #12635 Fixes #11522 ---- *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
This is a breaking change. Broke all my revolvers. How do we work around this? Feeling a little disappointed that:
|
GraphqlApi
create resolvers as PIPELINE resolvers stem from theGraphqlApi
itselfFixes #12635
Fixes #11522
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license