[cli] support adding multiple app names in cdk.json

[alimeerutech]

support adding multiple app names in cdk.json

{
"apps": [
  { 
    "name": "app1",
    "command": "python dir1/app.py"
  },
  {
    "name": "app2",
    "command": "python dir2/app.py"
  }
]
}

Use Case

If you have multiple apps sharing the same cdk.json you either have to pass in the app via cdk --app or copy cdk.json around, it would be much nicer if we could support having a single cdk.json with multiple apps

Proposed Solution

support adding multiple app names in cdk.json

{
"apps": [
  { 
    "name": "app1",
    "command": "python dir1/app.py"
  },
  {
    "name": "app2",
    "command": "python dir2/app.py"
  }
]
}

Other

• 👋 I may be able to implement this feature request
• ⚠️ This feature might incur a breaking change

---

This is a 🚀 Feature Request

[shivlaks]

@alimeerutech have you tried putting shared configuration in ~/.cdk.json as a user setting, or is the use case that you have a group of apps that require specific shared settings and you'd like to be able to specify it all within app?

We might have a duplicate issue for this, i'll have to look. It was something we said we'd consider for 2.0 IIRC

[alimeerutech]

correct, that is the case. We have multiple apps sharing the same context variables. thanks

…

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:35 AM Shiv Lakshminarayan < ***@***.***> wrote: @alimeerutech <https://github.com/alimeerutech> have you tried putting shared configuration in ~/.cdk.json as a user setting, or is the use case that you have a group of apps that require specific shared settings and you'd like to be able to specify it all within app? We might have a duplicate issue for this, i'll have to look. It was something we said we'd consider for 2.0 IIRC — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#9346 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AONGMYI3NC5JY6D24Y5S27DR6GVPFANCNFSM4PMNCZSQ> .

[Cloudrage]

+1
Or that way : #4543

[hannonq]

+1

[hkhrais]

+1

[bert-bae]

+1

[edgar-slalom]

+1

[ns-ajith]

+1

[brianarpie-forme]

+1

[cbou]

+1

[github-actions]

This issue has received a significant amount of attention so we are automatically upgrading its priority. A member of the community will see the re-prioritization and provide an update on the issue.

[cpalmer-ostmodern]

Would it be easier to use a mono repo with a shared cdk folder ?

[MathiasHaudgaard]

any updates?

[sigpop]

This would be useful.

[ribase]

Anything going on here, this feature still would be nice to have...