Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(merge-back): 1.63.0 #10336

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 14, 2020
Merged

chore(merge-back): 1.63.0 #10336

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 14, 2020

Conversation

aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation commented Sep 14, 2020

See CHANGELOG

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/no-squash This PR should be merged instead of squash-merging it label Sep 14, 2020
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 14, 2020

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically without squashing (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 14, 2020

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically without squashing (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator Author

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildProject6AEA49D1-qxepHUsryhcu
  • Commit ID: a0985ef
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 3d89964 into master Sep 14, 2020
@mergify mergify bot deleted the merge-back/1.63.0 branch September 14, 2020 10:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr/no-squash This PR should be merged instead of squash-merging it
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants