fix(iam): permissions boundaries not added to custom resource roles #14754
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The role created by
CustomResourceProvider
is aCfnResource
with a manual type, not aCfnRole
to avoid a cyclical dependency. But sincePermissionBoundary
assumes all role/user resources in scope are instances ofCfnRole
orCfnUser
, a permission boundary is not correctly applied to the custom resource's role (or any other role or user created directly throughCfnResource
).This PR solves the above problem by adding extra conditionals for the
CfnResource
case and adds permission boundaries through theaddPropertyOverride
escape hatch.fixes #13310
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license