Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: publishInParallel=false with tokens produces useless error m… #16196

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 24, 2021

Conversation

rix0rrr
Copy link
Contributor

@rix0rrr rix0rrr commented Aug 24, 2021

…essage

When a buildspec is written to disk at synth time and the BuildSpec
contains CFN references, the error produced is:

The "data" argument must be of type string or an instance of Buffer, TypedArray, or DataView. Received an instance of Object

Because it's trying to write the { Fn::Join } instead of a plain
string. This error message is pretty useless.

Supporting the feature correctly is a lot more complicated, but at
least we can detect this situation and give a more readable error
message.

Relates to #16164.


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

…essage

When a buildspec is written to disk at synth time and the BuildSpec
contains CFN references, the error produced is:

```
The "data" argument must be of type string or an instance of Buffer, TypedArray, or DataView. Received an instance of Object
```

Because it's trying to write the `{ Fn::Join }` instead of a plain
string. This error message is pretty useless.

Supporting the feature correctly is a lot more complicated, but at
least we can detect this situation and give a more readable error
message.

Relates to #16164.
@rix0rrr rix0rrr requested a review from a team August 24, 2021 08:58
@rix0rrr rix0rrr self-assigned this Aug 24, 2021
@gitpod-io
Copy link

gitpod-io bot commented Aug 24, 2021

@mergify mergify bot added the contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. label Aug 24, 2021
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Aug 24, 2021

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildProject89A8053A-LhjRyN9kxr8o
  • Commit ID: 9eedacc
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 1be373c into master Aug 24, 2021
@mergify mergify bot deleted the huijbers/buildspec-references branch August 24, 2021 10:54
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Aug 24, 2021

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

const fileContents = Stack.of(scope).resolve(actualBuildSpec.toBuildSpec());

if (typeof fileContents !== 'string') {
throw new Error(`This BuildSpec contains CloudFormation references and is supported by publishInParallel=false: ${JSON.stringify(fileContents, undefined, 2)}`);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think there is a typo here. It should say it's not supported, right?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏼

hollanddd pushed a commit to hollanddd/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2021
aws#16196)

…essage

When a buildspec is written to disk at synth time and the BuildSpec
contains CFN references, the error produced is:

```
The "data" argument must be of type string or an instance of Buffer, TypedArray, or DataView. Received an instance of Object
```

Because it's trying to write the `{ Fn::Join }` instead of a plain
string. This error message is pretty useless.

Supporting the feature correctly is a lot more complicated, but at
least we can detect this situation and give a more readable error
message.

Relates to aws#16164.


----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
TikiTDO pushed a commit to TikiTDO/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2021
aws#16196)

…essage

When a buildspec is written to disk at synth time and the BuildSpec
contains CFN references, the error produced is:

```
The "data" argument must be of type string or an instance of Buffer, TypedArray, or DataView. Received an instance of Object
```

Because it's trying to write the `{ Fn::Join }` instead of a plain
string. This error message is pretty useless.

Supporting the feature correctly is a lot more complicated, but at
least we can detect this situation and give a more readable error
message.

Relates to aws#16164.


----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
david-doyle-as24 pushed a commit to david-doyle-as24/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2021
aws#16196)

…essage

When a buildspec is written to disk at synth time and the BuildSpec
contains CFN references, the error produced is:

```
The "data" argument must be of type string or an instance of Buffer, TypedArray, or DataView. Received an instance of Object
```

Because it's trying to write the `{ Fn::Join }` instead of a plain
string. This error message is pretty useless.

Supporting the feature correctly is a lot more complicated, but at
least we can detect this situation and give a more readable error
message.

Relates to aws#16164.


----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants