Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(pipelines): Fix documentation regarding rolePolicyStatements of CodeBuildStep #16294

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 1, 2021
Merged

docs(pipelines): Fix documentation regarding rolePolicyStatements of CodeBuildStep #16294

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 1, 2021

Conversation

markusl
Copy link
Contributor

@markusl markusl commented Aug 31, 2021

fix(pipelines): Fix documentation regarding rolePolicyStatements of CodeBuildStep


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@gitpod-io
Copy link

gitpod-io bot commented Aug 31, 2021

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Aug 31, 2021

Title does not follow the guidelines of Conventional Commits. Please adjust title before merge.

@markusl markusl changed the title fix(pipelines) Fix documentation regarding rolePolicyStatements of Co… fix(pipelines): Fix documentation regarding rolePolicyStatements of CodeBuildStep Aug 31, 2021
@markusl markusl changed the title fix(pipelines): Fix documentation regarding rolePolicyStatements of CodeBuildStep chore(pipelines): Fix documentation regarding rolePolicyStatements of CodeBuildStep Aug 31, 2021
@peterwoodworth peterwoodworth changed the title chore(pipelines): Fix documentation regarding rolePolicyStatements of CodeBuildStep docs(pipelines): Fix documentation regarding rolePolicyStatements of CodeBuildStep Sep 1, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@peterwoodworth peterwoodworth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for catching this!

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 1, 2021

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildProject89A8053A-LhjRyN9kxr8o
  • Commit ID: cf26182
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 2c1eb08 into aws:master Sep 1, 2021
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 1, 2021

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@markusl markusl deleted the fix-doc-policystatement branch September 2, 2021 05:08
madeline-k pushed a commit to madeline-k/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2021
…CodeBuildStep (aws#16294)

fix(pipelines): Fix documentation regarding rolePolicyStatements of CodeBuildStep

----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
TikiTDO pushed a commit to TikiTDO/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2021
…CodeBuildStep (aws#16294)

fix(pipelines): Fix documentation regarding rolePolicyStatements of CodeBuildStep

----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
david-doyle-as24 pushed a commit to david-doyle-as24/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2021
…CodeBuildStep (aws#16294)

fix(pipelines): Fix documentation regarding rolePolicyStatements of CodeBuildStep

----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants