Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(assert): clarify assert library use with monocdk. #17202

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 28, 2021

Conversation

tendermario
Copy link
Contributor

@tendermario tendermario commented Oct 28, 2021

Using monocdk with the @aws-cdk/assert creates problems. I initially was going to create a PR to fix the problem it created (some circular dependency unravelling which JSON.stringify fails on, along with alarms not actually being found to be added to the stack I was testing), but instead I found this is what we should use instead, which this readme update would have saved me a lot of time troubleshooting.

This I believe should put this line right below the quote section in the top of both https://www.npmjs.com/package/@aws-cdk/assert and https://www.npmjs.com/package/@monocdk-experiment/assert


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

Using monocdk with the @aws-cdk/assert creates problems. I
initially was going to create a PR to fix the problem it created,
but instead I found this is what we should use instead, which this
readme update would have saved me a lot of time troubleshooting.
@gitpod-io
Copy link

gitpod-io bot commented Oct 28, 2021

@github-actions github-actions bot added the @aws-cdk/assert Related to the @aws-cdk/assert package label Oct 28, 2021
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 28, 2021

Title does not follow the guidelines of Conventional Commits. Please adjust title before merge.

@nija-at nija-at changed the title Add clarification on assert library use with monocdk. docs(assert): clarify assert library use with monocdk. Oct 28, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@nija-at nija-at left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Excellent. Thank you!

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 28, 2021

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildProject89A8053A-LhjRyN9kxr8o
  • Commit ID: 8e69f93
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 7f19400 into aws:master Oct 28, 2021
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 28, 2021

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

TikiTDO pushed a commit to TikiTDO/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2022
Using monocdk with the @aws-cdk/assert creates problems. I initially was going to create a PR to fix the problem it created (some circular dependency unravelling which JSON.stringify fails on, along with alarms not actually being found to be added to the stack I was testing), but instead I found this is what we should use instead, which this readme update would have saved me a lot of time troubleshooting.

This I believe should put this line right below the quote section in the top of both https://www.npmjs.com/package/@aws-cdk/assert and https://www.npmjs.com/package/@monocdk-experiment/assert

----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
@aws-cdk/assert Related to the @aws-cdk/assert package
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants