fix(custom-resources): Custom resource provider framework not passing ResponseURL to user function
#21065
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
github-actions
bot
added
bug
comcalvi
added
pr-linter/exempt-test
comcalvi
requested review from
MrArnoldPalmer
and removed request for
MrArnoldPalmer
MrArnoldPalmer
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2022
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
comcalvi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2022
… `ResponseURL` to user function (#21065) #20889 included a change that broke the custom resource framework by not including the necessary presigned URL. This includes the presigned URL, and fixes the issue. This PR does not include test changes because this is the runtime code. Closes #21058 ---- *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
comcalvi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2022
… `ResponseURL` to user function (#21065) #20889 included a change that broke the custom resource framework by not including the necessary presigned URL. This includes the presigned URL, and fixes the issue. This PR does not include test changes because this is the runtime code. Closes #21058 ---- *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
daschaa
pushed a commit
to daschaa/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2022
… `ResponseURL` to user function (aws#21065) aws#20889 included a change that broke the custom resource framework by not including the necessary presigned URL. This includes the presigned URL, and fixes the issue. This PR does not include test changes because this is the runtime code. Closes aws#21058 ---- *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2022
… passing `ResponseURL` to user function" (#21109) This PR did not actually fix the issue with custom resources, it just passed a `ResponseURL: '...'`, which isn't a usable URL. Leaving it as a sanitized string makes it appear as if the `ResponseURL` is available, but it actually isn't. Reverting this PR to not give the false impression that `ResponseURL` is usable. Reverts #21065
mrgrain
added a commit
to mrgrain/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2022
… `ResponseURL` to user function (aws#21065) aws#20889 included a change that broke the custom resource framework by not including the necessary presigned URL. We attempted to fix this with aws#21065 but it didn't resolve the issue and aws#21109 reverted the attempted fix. This changes explicitly includes the presigned URL, as well as adding tests to ensure the URL is passed to the downstream Lambda Function. Closes aws#21058
4 tasks
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2022
… `ResponseURL` to user function (#21117) #20889 included a change that broke the custom resource framework by not including the necessary presigned URL. We attempted to fix this with #21065 but it didn't resolve the issue and #21109 reverted the attempted fix. This changes explicitly includes the presigned URL, as well as adding tests to ensure the URL is passed to the downstream Lambda Function. Closes #21058 ---- ### All Submissions: * [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) ### New Features * [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [ ] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2022
… `ResponseURL` to user function (#21117) aws#20889 included a change that broke the custom resource framework by not including the necessary presigned URL. We attempted to fix this with #21065 but it didn't resolve the issue and #21109 reverted the attempted fix. This changes explicitly includes the presigned URL, as well as adding tests to ensure the URL is passed to the downstream Lambda Function. Closes #21058 ---- ### All Submissions: * [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) ### New Features * [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [ ] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license* (cherry picked from commit ddfca48) # Conflicts: # packages/@aws-cdk/custom-resources/lib/provider-framework/runtime/framework.ts
kaizencc
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2022
… `ResponseURL` to user function (#21117) #20889 included a change that broke the custom resource framework by not including the necessary presigned URL. We attempted to fix this with #21065 but it didn't resolve the issue and #21109 reverted the attempted fix. This changes explicitly includes the presigned URL, as well as adding tests to ensure the URL is passed to the downstream Lambda Function. Closes #21058 ---- * [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) * [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [ ] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
This was referenced Mar 31, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#20889 included a change that broke the custom resource framework by not including the necessary presigned URL. This includes the presigned URL, and fixes the issue. This PR does not include test changes because this is the runtime code.
Closes #21058
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license