Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: ECS service replacement regression #22978

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 18, 2022
Merged

Conversation

rix0rrr
Copy link
Contributor

@rix0rrr rix0rrr commented Nov 18, 2022

The behavior introduced in #22467 was too eager, changing the no-feature flag behavior for all services, not just services with a circuit breaker.


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

The behavior introduced in #22467 was too eager, changing the no-feature
flag behavior for all services, not just services with a circuit breaker.
@rix0rrr rix0rrr requested a review from a team November 18, 2022 15:44
@rix0rrr rix0rrr self-assigned this Nov 18, 2022
@rix0rrr rix0rrr changed the title fix: fix ECS service replacement regression fix: ECS service replacement regression Nov 18, 2022
@gitpod-io
Copy link

gitpod-io bot commented Nov 18, 2022

@rix0rrr rix0rrr marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2022 15:44
@github-actions github-actions bot added the p2 label Nov 18, 2022
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team November 18, 2022 15:45
@rix0rrr
Copy link
Contributor Author

rix0rrr commented Nov 18, 2022

Tests are forthcoming.

@mergify mergify bot added the contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. label Nov 18, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

@rix0rrr rix0rrr added the pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes label Nov 18, 2022
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review November 18, 2022 16:50

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dissmissing previous PRLinter review.

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 18, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: 5a41c9c
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 0292d3f into main Nov 18, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the huijbers/fix-ecs-regression branch November 18, 2022 18:04
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 18, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

TheRealAmazonKendra pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2022
The behavior introduced in #22467 was too eager, changing the no-feature flag behavior for all services, not just services with a circuit breaker.


----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. p2 pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants