-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(rds): unable to create cluster with per-instance parameters (under feature flag) #27040
fix(rds): unable to create cluster with per-instance parameters (under feature flag) #27040
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.
A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request
. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request
to a comment.
Exemption Request because I think this bug can be covered in an unit test. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @go-to-k for this change!
I think we should just put this behind a feature flag. That makes it the default for new apps and opt-in for existing apps.
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ class AuroraClusterInstance extends Resource implements IAuroraClusterInstance { | |||
|
|||
const instanceParameterGroup = props.parameterGroup ?? ( | |||
props.parameters | |||
? new ParameterGroup(props.cluster, 'InstanceParameterGroup', { | |||
? new ParameterGroup(props.cluster, `${id}InstanceParameterGroup`, { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I reckon this would be better:
? new ParameterGroup(props.cluster, `${id}InstanceParameterGroup`, { | |
? new ParameterGroup(this, `InstanceParameterGroup`, { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, I changed!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I missed to change tests for this changes. I will apply...
Thanks for your review!
I have never had a modification that required a feature flag. Is there anything I should do with this PR? |
Exciting! The required steps are described in the contributing guide. LMK if you run into any issues. |
@go-to-k I would like to see this deploying though. You should be able to do a small adjustment to an existing integ test. |
I tried to respond to the feature flag and an integ test. Please check if there is anything wrong. |
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
Pull request has been modified.
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
This PR fixes that DatabaseCluster cannot create multiple readers with each parameters.
Closes #27035.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license