Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(cdk): add AppSync GraphQLSchema and pipeline resolvers as hot swappable #27197
feat(cdk): add AppSync GraphQLSchema and pipeline resolvers as hot swappable #27197
Changes from 2 commits
4e209c3
8ec132c
8d472c2
f5c6e9f
7dabd1c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What does the user flow look like with any of the
*S3Location
properties? The MappingTemplate doesn't support an S3 location, and it also doesn't use it under the hood.Even if it was supported, the user would have to change the s3 location for hotswap to be able to see it, not the object itself; diff will only detect a change in the object's location, not its contents. Users won't want to rename the object every time they make a change to it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tagging @alharris-at for more details. I believe we are using L1 CFN resource here and manually managing the
requestMappingTemplateS3Location
properties from our L3 data construct. (Don't know if it's the right reference https://github.com/aws-amplify/amplify-category-api/blob/c6772cfb9c0c68d6de4c04aa8190489fba0557a9/packages/graphql-transformer-core/src/util/SchemaResourceUtil.ts#L37)In my testing, when updating high level amplify schema that results in a resolver change, I found only
*S3Location
properties to have changed. @alharris-at can you provide more details here?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because Synth produces assets with a hash in the filename, I think the S3Location will change if a resolver or function's code is updated, and yeah we use L1 constructs here.
@comcalvi not urgent, but we might actually want to open the discussion to using S3Location instead of the inline approach for the L2 (when a file is provided), since that means customers will far more quickly hit Cfn template size limits (we see this happen for Amplify customers w/o inlining much of these assets, since with AppSync it's easy to produce a large number of resources quickly, and if we're inlining all code then it's going to expand very quickly).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ahh okay, so the s3 locations are managed through the CDK here. That makes sense, thanks for clarifying.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good workaround for the orchestration / resource dependency problem, nice work
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you make a little helper for this, similar to: https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/packages/aws-cdk/lib/util/archive.ts#L84
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea, updated.