feat: adding on-demandthroughput to table construct #30097
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
beginning-contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.
A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.
|
Exemption Request : README is failing because the Table (V1) is now maintained under TABLE_V1_API.md |
aws-cdk-automation
dismissed
their stale review
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
aws-cdk-automation
added
the
pr/needs-community-review
|
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
|
This PR has been in the MERGE CONFLICTS state for 3 weeks, and looks abandoned. To keep this PR from being closed, please continue work on it. If not, it will automatically be closed in a week. |
|
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
2 similar comments
|
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
|
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
|
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
2 similar comments
|
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
|
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
|
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
6 similar comments
|
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
|
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
|
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
|
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
|
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
|
This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state. |
Issue # (if applicable)
Closes #30091
Reason for this change
New DynamoDB feature that was just released
Description of changes
Added
maxReadRequestUnitsandmaxWriteRequestUnitsfor PAY_PER_REQUEST tablesDescription of how you validated changes
Tests on
integ.dynamodb.ondemand.tsChecklist
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license