-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(doc): improve the doc on DockerImageFunction for cross-platform bundling #31053
chore(doc): improve the doc on DockerImageFunction for cross-platform bundling #31053
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Pahud! Small typo to fix, otherwise looks good to me.
Co-authored-by: Grace Luo <54298030+gracelu0@users.noreply.github.com>
Just fixed the typo. Thank you @gracelu0 |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see. |
Issue # (if applicable)
Closes #31048
Reason for this change
Per discussed #31048 (comment), the
architecture
would still be required when bundlingX86_64
DockerImageFunction from aarm64
machine like a Macbook with arm64 chip as it explicitly pass the--platform
argument todocker build
, which is required in this use case.Description of changes
Description of how you validated changes
Checklist
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license