-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(codepipeline-action): add support for externalEntityLink in the manual approval action #5558
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3aa1c06
Add support for externalEntityLink in the manual approval action
michaelbrewer 3c14983
Merge branch 'master' into michaelbrewer/feature-5557
michaelbrewer 68d2360
Added missing @default documentation
michaelbrewer d8a4fde
Updated docs about externalEntityLink
michaelbrewer 17cd4c0
Merge branch 'master' into michaelbrewer/feature-5557
michaelbrewer 1ef7a11
Merge branch 'master' into michaelbrewer/feature-5557
michaelbrewer b3ecea6
Merge branch 'master' into michaelbrewer/feature-5557
michaelbrewer 9bd4b95
Merge branch 'master' into michaelbrewer/feature-5557
michaelbrewer 20ffac9
Merge branch 'master' into michaelbrewer/feature-5557
michaelbrewer File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is that condition ("must begin with 'http://' or 'https://'") checked by the CodePipeline API? Should we add some validation on our side that errors out if that is not the case?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@skinny85
I am not sure, i know that the AWS console does this kind of validation. Are there some common examples of this kind of validation in CDK?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@skinny85 - Would something like this work?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, that could work :) (+ a unit test for this behavior, of course 😃). However, I'd rather not add this validation unless the CodePipeline API performs it as well (I don't think we should disallows things that the API accepts). Can you verify whether the CodePipeline API fails if you provide something that does not start with 'http://' or 'https://'? Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@skinny85 - APL does allow for urls without http:// or https://, so i updated the docs to reflect this.