Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(cloudtrail): user specified log group #8079
feat(cloudtrail): user specified log group #8079
Changes from 1 commit
2cdd37e
fbd40cb
a2e653a
828682a
8df0f3c
017693a
a8e009c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how come
!.
- @eladb had mentioned in another PR that we generally try to avoid it in our codebase. Although this is a test, I think we should try and be consistent if it's a style we generally don't preferThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test verifies that
t.logGroup
is notundefined
and returns an ARN (vs. the other case where it returnsundefined
).How should I update my assertions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
unfortunately, something a little more naive - here's the similar example in the PR i mentioned
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I'm not following what the change you're expecting here is. The unit testing in the linked PR is testing something quite different from what I'm trying to here.
Can you tell me what's wrong with the current assertion, and how you would write it?
I can either assert for it being not
undefined
or for the value it returns. I've chosen the latter. Is there a 3rd option?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd do the former, but I'm not picky on this. go for it!