Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for Amazon States Language "ResultSelector" in Task, Map … #102
Add support for Amazon States Language "ResultSelector" in Task, Map … #102
Changes from 5 commits
c05c90f
8667c37
851fc0e
3430024
e67804b
2758879
9df0b8d
ca45e9e
a7016da
eb0a82c
5f5c4ca
6871e03
21595dc
f4cb764
6594b1c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still wondering if it's really necessary to introduce StepResult when StepInput could also be used to achieve the same thing. I left that comment earlier but it didn't get an answer. Literally the only difference is the class name. Thoughts @shivlaks?
We can always add classes later, but removing it afterwards breaks back-compat.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question - I missed that comment earlier
While it does make sense to use the same object, I think the name
StepInput
could bring confusion since, in this case, we are not using the step's input, but the step's result (or output)To be backwards compatible, we can't rename
StepInput
to a more general term. Alternatively, we could makeStepResult
inherit fromStepInput
instead ofPlaceholder
and avoid code duplication.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maintaining these docstrings for every inheriting class is pretty annoying. I wonder if there anything we can do to make that easier.