Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing explicit dependency on core #92

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2016
Merged

Conversation

shorea
Copy link
Contributor

@shorea shorea commented Aug 8, 2016

Allows customers to more intuitively override client dependencies. For example if I want a newer version of the dynamo db client I'd expect it to prefer it's dependency on core but since they are at the same level it's ambiguous which version of core will be resolved.

See aws/aws-sdk-java#806

@pfifer pfifer added this to the v1.7.0 milestone Aug 11, 2016
@pfifer pfifer merged commit e28ca00 into awslabs:master Aug 11, 2016
pfifer added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2016
* Add support for time based iterators ([See GetShardIterator Documentation](http://docs.aws.amazon.com/kinesis/latest/APIReference/API_GetShardIterator.html))
  * [PR #94](#94)
  The `KinesisClientLibConfiguration` now supports providing an initial time stamp position.
  * This position is only used if there is no current checkpoint for the shard.
  * This setting cannot be used with DynamoDB Streams
  Resolves [Issue #88](#88)
* Allow Prioritization of Parent Shards for Task Assignment
  * [PR #95](#95)
  The `KinesisClientLibconfiguration` now supports providing a `ShardPrioritization` strategy.  This strategy controls how the `Worker` determines which `ShardConsumer` to call next.  This can improve processing for streams that split often, such as DynamoDB Streams.
* Remove direct dependency on `aws-java-sdk-core`, to allow independent versioning.
  * [PR #92](#92)
  **You may need to add a direct dependency on aws-java-sdk-core if other dependencies include an older version.**
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants