Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed minor bugs in GluonTSFramework. #585

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 7, 2020

Conversation

AaronSpieler
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes:
Fixed bug regarding wait parameter in train function of GluonTSFramework.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 30, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #585 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 85.71%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #585   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.72%   83.72%           
=======================================
  Files         181      181           
  Lines       10326    10326           
=======================================
  Hits         8645     8645           
  Misses       1681     1681
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/gluonts/block/cnn.py 56.41% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
src/gluonts/model/n_beats/_estimator.py 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
src/gluonts/model/n_beats/_ensemble.py 89.55% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
src/gluonts/model/n_beats/_network.py 90.9% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
src/gluonts/support/util.py 90.38% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

@AaronSpieler AaronSpieler changed the title Fixed bug regarding wait parameter in train function of GluonTSFramework. Fixed minor bugs in GluonTSFramework. Jan 30, 2020
@lostella lostella added this to the v0.5 milestone Jan 31, 2020
@jaheba
Copy link
Contributor

jaheba commented Jan 31, 2020

Is that base_job_name handling the same as in other frameworks?

@AaronSpieler
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is that base_job_name handling the same as in other frameworks?

Actually it does not seem to be that way, job_name will be the actual job name. However, I find that counter intuitive, since one already defines a base_job_name.

@jaheba
Copy link
Contributor

jaheba commented Jan 31, 2020

Then let’s not do that as well. The idea behind the base job is to specify the job name just once and then spawn of jobs from that.

jaheba
jaheba previously requested changes Jan 31, 2020
src/gluonts/nursery/sagemaker_sdk/estimator.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/gluonts/nursery/sagemaker_sdk/utils.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@AaronSpieler
Copy link
Contributor Author

Then let’s not do that as well. The idea behind the base job is to specify the job name just once and then spawn of jobs from that.

ok

lostella
lostella previously approved these changes Feb 6, 2020
@lostella lostella dismissed their stale review February 6, 2020 21:55

overlooked some changes

@alexw91
Copy link
Member

alexw91 commented Feb 6, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #585 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #585      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.73%   83.72%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         181      181              
  Lines       10324    10326       +2     
==========================================
  Hits         8645     8645              
- Misses       1679     1681       +2     

@AaronSpieler AaronSpieler dismissed jaheba’s stale review February 7, 2020 01:09

applied requested changes

@AaronSpieler AaronSpieler merged commit 90587ba into awslabs:master Feb 7, 2020
@AaronSpieler AaronSpieler deleted the generic branch February 20, 2020 12:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants