Add support for different SQLite journal modes #193
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
stefunctional
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2024
tomleavy
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issues:
N/A
Description of changes:
Describe the current behavior and how your code changes that behavior. If there are no issues that this PR resolves, please create one first.
Allows for changing the journal mode for SQLite. This potentially also mitigates an issue where the database could get corrupted if a connection terminates while being updated from the default journal mode.
Call-outs:
Point out areas that need special attention or support during the review process. Discuss architecture or design changes.
N/A
Testing:
How is this change tested (unit tests, fuzz tests, etc.)? Are there any testing steps to be verified by the reviewer?
Added a unit test covering the functionality. Existing unit tests which tangentially use the function are also passing.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT license.