-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump aws-c-s3 to v0.2.9 #228
Conversation
This picks up the fix for awslabs#218. Signed-off-by: James Bornholt <bornholt@amazon.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the process to upgrade the crt for our Mountpoint? I got the changes that are in the update like yml files issue template and workflow on github and changes to include the case of bytes = "0-0".
And there is a test for it as well, so that should be fine.
#226 should pass now I guess.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a good question. Would it be helpful if the PR (maybe an automated comment) would point you to this document?
Also, does it feel like there's information missing?
I think what we really need to do is review the commit history (not the diff), and if there's anything that sounds relevant for us - we should dig deeper and check there's no changes we care about. For example, we should worry if the lifetime (in C) changes for a parameter we pass in.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, got it. The document explains the process for updating the submodule, not the reviewer right?
Yes, for the first time reviewer an automated comment about the document will help.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, maybe we can add some pointers for what a reviewer should look for.
Improve PartQueue to report an error (rather than blocking indeterminately) when trying to read beyond the body returned by the GetObject request. The previous behavior, compounded with a bug in the CRT (now fixed: #228) where GetObject unexpectedly returned an empty body, manifested in #218. --------- Signed-off-by: Alessandro Passaro <alexpax@amazon.co.uk>
This picks up the fix for #218.
Signed-off-by: James Bornholt bornholt@amazon.com
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license and I agree to the terms of the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO).