-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CQL Support #750
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
CQL Support #750
Conversation
Hi @jisantuc! I'm working with STAC and franklin and needing to be able to filter, hence finding this issue. Any idea of the time frame on this? Would you expect this PR to work in the meantime if I were to use it? Thanks for your effort! |
Hey @kthyng 👋 I'm afraid there is no definite answer to your question, in the meantime you may try to use the implemented query extension and mb it will be good enough for your purposes. |
@pomadchin Thanks for your response! I had tried to use the query extension in the past and thought I couldn't get it to work, but I will try again. Should it work as described in the STAC query readme? Or any examples you could point me to? |
@kthyng yes! that is exactly it. just add an extra |
@kthyng a little more background -- you can see over in the API spec repo that the filter extension is still evolving. This is in part due to ongoing work in the OGC group around conformance class organization and what functionality lives where. This PR implemented a very early version of the filter extension as a test of how easy / difficult that would be -- support of the current form of the filter extension would require new work I believe. |
Thanks @jisantuc, that makes sense. I asked about timing in the STAC gitter and heard the following for what it's worth!
|
Overview
This PR holds the attempted implementation in Franklin of CQL filters as described in radiantearth/stac-api-spec#128. The culmination of the PR was filter extension feedback in that PR and the related OGC CQL PR.
Checklist
Notes
This will stay a draft until there's more work to do with the
filter
extension -- it removes thequery
extension implementation which is not quite dead yet, so it's a little stuck.Testing Instructions