Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Regen lib/types #7180

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2018
Merged

Regen lib/types #7180

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2018

Conversation

existentialism
Copy link
Member

@existentialism existentialism commented Jan 9, 2018

Q                       A
Fixed Issues?
Patch: Bug Fix?
Major: Breaking Change?
Minor: New Feature?
Tests Added + Pass? Yes
Documentation PR
Any Dependency Changes?
License MIT

Missed a regen after some additions in #7107, doing this separately to make an upcoming PR cleaner.

@existentialism existentialism added the PR: Internal 🏠 A type of pull request used for our changelog categories label Jan 9, 2018
Copy link
Member

@nicolo-ribaudo nicolo-ribaudo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could make travis ci open the PR itself in the future.

@babel-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Build successful! You can test your changes in the REPL here: https://babeljs.io/repl/build/6534/

@existentialism existentialism merged commit 3e5fce0 into master Jan 9, 2018
@existentialism existentialism deleted the regen-types branch January 9, 2018 15:25
@lock lock bot added the outdated A closed issue/PR that is archived due to age. Recommended to make a new issue label Oct 5, 2019
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 5, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
outdated A closed issue/PR that is archived due to age. Recommended to make a new issue PR: Internal 🏠 A type of pull request used for our changelog categories
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants