Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Update btcstaking module documentation #123

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

samricotta
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Update to btcstaking docs

  • Revised wording to align with standard Cosmos SDK practices, ensuring clarity for users. Each module should utilise a single KV store, with different data types organised using prefixed namespaces within that store, instead of creating multiple KV stores.
  • Updates to query params documentation

@samricotta samricotta requested a review from a team as a code owner October 2, 2024 14:50
@samricotta samricotta requested review from KonradStaniec and Lazar955 and removed request for a team October 2, 2024 14:50

### Parameters

The [parameter storage](./keeper/params.go) maintains the BTC Staking module's
The [parameter management](./keeper/params.go) maintains the BTC Staking module's
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Each module should utilise a single KV store, with different data types organised using prefixed namespaces within that store, instead of creating multiple KV stores. This becomes a manager not storage

Copy link
Collaborator

@KonradStaniec KonradStaniec left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@samricotta samricotta merged commit b8bcb89 into main Oct 3, 2024
18 checks passed
@maurolacy maurolacy deleted the btc-staking-rm branch October 4, 2024 04:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants