feat(documents): add schemas for financial information and proof of o… #2844
Conversation
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces two new document types to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@alonp99 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 18 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
sdks/workflow-browser-sdk/package.json (1)
Update vite dependency to version 5.4.11 to address security vulnerabilities
The current version (4.5.3) is outdated and potentially vulnerable. The latest stable version is 5.4.11 which includes security patches for:
- DOM Clobbering vulnerabilities that could lead to XSS
- Server filesystem access bypass vulnerabilities when using
?import&rawPlease update the dependency version in package.json to:
"vite": "^5.4.11"🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
82-82: Verify vite dependency version for security advisories.Let's verify if the current vite version (4.5.3) is the latest secure version.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for security advisories and latest versions of vite # Check npm for latest versions curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/vite | jq '.["dist-tags"]' # Check for security advisories gh api graphql -f query=' { securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "vite") { nodes { advisory { summary severity publishedAt } vulnerableVersionRange firstPatchedVersion { identifier } } } }'Length of output: 1759
services/websocket-service/CHANGELOG.md (1)
Line range hint
9-13: Fix typo in version 0.1.24 entryThe word "Cump" appears to be a typo and should be "Bump" to maintain consistency with other entries.
## 0.1.24 ### Patch Changes - Cump + Bumpexamples/report-generation-example/CHANGELOG.md (1)
3-10: Consider establishing better versioning practicesThe changelog history shows very frequent patch version increments with minimal description. This pattern might indicate:
- Too frequent releases without meaningful changes
- Tight coupling between packages requiring constant version synchronization
- Missing automation for dependency updates
Consider:
- Batching multiple dependency updates into single releases
- Using automated dependency update tools (e.g., Dependabot)
- Implementing proper semantic versioning practices
packages/react-pdf-toolkit/CHANGELOG.md (1)
7-7: Consider adding more descriptive changelog messages.The message "Bump" is not very informative. Consider describing what motivated these dependency updates or what benefits they bring. This helps other developers understand the purpose of the changes.
Example of a more descriptive message:
-Bump +Updated dependencies to maintain compatibility with latest financial information schemasapps/backoffice-v2/package.json (1)
Line range hint
200-203: Update peer dependencies to match the project's React versionThe peer dependencies specify React 17, but the project is using React 18 (as seen in the dependencies section). This mismatch should be addressed to prevent potential compatibility issues.
Apply this diff to update the peer dependencies:
"peerDependencies": { - "react": "^17.0.0", - "react-dom": "^17.0.0" + "react": "^18.0.0", + "react-dom": "^18.0.0" }packages/blocks/CHANGELOG.md (1)
Line range hint
13-16: Minor typo in the previous version entryThere appears to be a typo in the word "Cump" which should be "Bump" to maintain consistency with other entries.
-Cump +Bumppackages/workflow-core/CHANGELOG.md (1)
7-7: Enhance the changelog description.The current description "Bump" is too vague. Consider adding more context about what was updated and why.
-Bump +Updated @ballerine/common dependency to incorporate latest changesexamples/headless-example/CHANGELOG.md (1)
7-7: Improve changelog message clarityThe message "Bump" is not descriptive and doesn't provide any meaningful information about the changes. This makes it difficult for users to understand what has changed in this version.
Consider using more descriptive messages that explain the purpose of the changes, even for minor updates. For example:
- "Updated dependencies to latest versions for security and stability"
- "Maintenance release: dependency updates"
sdks/workflow-browser-sdk/CHANGELOG.md (2)
7-7: Consider using more descriptive change messages.The message "Bump" doesn't effectively communicate the nature of changes. Consider describing what was actually changed or why the version was bumped.
Example of a better message:
-Bump +Updated dependencies to latest versions for security and compatibility
3-10: LGTM! Changelog structure is consistent.The version entry follows the established format with clear separation of patch changes and dependency updates.
For future changelog maintenance:
- Use descriptive messages that explain the reason for changes
- Include any breaking changes or deprecations prominently
- Reference relevant issue or PR numbers when applicable
services/workflows-service/CHANGELOG.md (1)
7-7: Enhance the changelog description.The description "Bump" is too vague. Consider providing more meaningful information about the changes, such as the reason for the dependency updates or any notable changes they bring.
Apply this diff to improve the description:
-### Patch Changes - -- Bump +### Patch Changes + +- Updated dependencies to latest versions to incorporate recent fixes and improvements
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (40)
apps/backoffice-v2/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)apps/backoffice-v2/package.json(3 hunks)apps/kyb-app/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)apps/kyb-app/package.json(3 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json(3 hunks)examples/headless-example/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)examples/headless-example/package.json(2 hunks)examples/report-generation-example/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)examples/report-generation-example/package.json(2 hunks)packages/blocks/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/blocks/package.json(3 hunks)packages/common/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/common/package.json(2 hunks)packages/common/src/schemas/documents/workflow/documents/schemas/ZZ.ts(2 hunks)packages/config/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/config/package.json(1 hunks)packages/eslint-config-react/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/eslint-config-react/package.json(2 hunks)packages/eslint-config/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/eslint-config/package.json(1 hunks)packages/react-pdf-toolkit/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/react-pdf-toolkit/package.json(2 hunks)packages/rules-engine/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/rules-engine/package.json(2 hunks)packages/ui/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/ui/package.json(3 hunks)packages/workflow-core/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/workflow-core/package.json(3 hunks)sdks/web-ui-sdk/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)sdks/web-ui-sdk/package.json(2 hunks)sdks/workflow-browser-sdk/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)sdks/workflow-browser-sdk/package.json(2 hunks)sdks/workflow-node-sdk/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)sdks/workflow-node-sdk/package.json(2 hunks)services/websocket-service/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)services/websocket-service/package.json(1 hunks)services/workflows-service/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)services/workflows-service/package.json(3 hunks)websites/docs/package.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (24)
- apps/backoffice-v2/CHANGELOG.md
- apps/kyb-app/CHANGELOG.md
- apps/workflows-dashboard/CHANGELOG.md
- apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json
- examples/headless-example/package.json
- examples/report-generation-example/package.json
- packages/common/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/common/package.json
- packages/config/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/config/package.json
- packages/eslint-config-react/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/eslint-config-react/package.json
- packages/eslint-config/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/eslint-config/package.json
- packages/react-pdf-toolkit/package.json
- packages/rules-engine/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/rules-engine/package.json
- packages/ui/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/ui/package.json
- sdks/web-ui-sdk/CHANGELOG.md
- sdks/workflow-node-sdk/CHANGELOG.md
- sdks/workflow-node-sdk/package.json
- services/websocket-service/package.json
- services/workflows-service/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (15)
websites/docs/package.json (1)
20-20: Verify version consistency across the monorepo
The dependency updates look correct, but let's verify that these versions are consistent across all packages in the monorepo.
Also applies to: 26-27
✅ Verification successful
Dependency versions are consistent across the monorepo
The verification shows that all packages are using consistent versions:
- @ballerine/common: 0.9.52 (with some using ^ prefix)
- @ballerine/config: ^1.1.25
- @ballerine/eslint-config: ^1.1.25
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for version consistency of @ballerine packages across the monorepo
echo "Checking @ballerine/common version..."
fd package.json --type f --exec grep -l "@ballerine/common" {} \; | xargs grep "\"@ballerine/common\""
echo -e "\nChecking @ballerine/config version..."
fd package.json --type f --exec grep -l "@ballerine/config" {} \; | xargs grep "\"@ballerine/config\""
echo -e "\nChecking @ballerine/eslint-config version..."
fd package.json --type f --exec grep -l "@ballerine/eslint-config" {} \; | xargs grep "\"@ballerine/eslint-config\""
Length of output: 3221
sdks/workflow-browser-sdk/package.json (1)
4-4: LGTM: Version updates are consistent.
The version bumps across the package and its dependencies appear to be coordinated patch-level updates.
Also applies to: 36-37, 44-44, 46-46
packages/workflow-core/package.json (3)
4-4: LGTM: Version bump follows semver.
The package version increment from 0.6.64 to 0.6.65 is appropriate for maintenance updates.
48-49: LGTM: Dev dependencies updates are patch versions.
The updates to @ballerine/config and @ballerine/eslint-config are patch version changes using caret ranges, which is appropriate for development dependencies.
34-34: Verify the impact of @ballerine/common update.
The update to @ballerine/common (0.9.51 -> 0.9.52) is a patch version change. Let's verify the changes in the common package to ensure compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the changes in the common package to ensure there are no breaking changes that could impact the workflow-core package.
Based on the git history, I can see that the changes between versions are related to dependency bumps, document schemas, and a transaction fix. Let me check the specific changes in these commits to ensure there are no breaking changes.
Based on the git history and changes shown, I can determine that the update from 0.9.51 to 0.9.52 in @ballerine/common includes:
- Addition of new document schemas for financial information (bank statement) and proof of ownership (company structure)
- Package version bump and dependency updates
- No breaking changes or API modifications were introduced
The update is safe as it only adds new schemas and bumps dependencies.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the changelog and package.json of @ballerine/common for breaking changes
# Find and display the relevant package.json
fd -t f "package.json" -x grep -l "@ballerine/common"
# Find and display any CHANGELOG entries
fd -t f "CHANGELOG.md" -x grep -A 5 "0.9.52"
Length of output: 1485
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the changes in the common package between versions 0.9.51 and 0.9.52
# First, let's look for any git tags related to these versions
git tag | grep -E "common@0.9.5[1-2]"
# Let's also check the commit history in the common package directory
git log --oneline -- packages/common/
# Check for any API changes in the common package
ast-grep --pattern 'export $_'
Length of output: 308
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the specific changes in these commits
git show c67a596 -- packages/common/
git show b4732a5 -- packages/common/
git show 513eb4c -- packages/common/
# Also check for any changes in the package.json
git diff c67a596^..513eb4c -- packages/common/package.json
Length of output: 244856
apps/kyb-app/package.json (2)
4-4: LGTM! Version updates are consistent
The version bumps follow semantic versioning and are coordinated across the @ballerine ecosystem. The updates align with the PR objectives to add new schemas for financial information and proof of ownership.
Also applies to: 18-21, 67-68
4-4: Verify the contents of updated @ballerine packages
The version updates look consistent across the ecosystem. Let's verify that these updates include the schema changes mentioned in the PR objectives.
Also applies to: 18-21, 67-68
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the schema changes by checking the actual schema files and recent commits.
Based on the git log output, I can now generate the final response as we have clear evidence of the schema changes.
Version updates confirmed with corresponding schema changes
The version updates are verified to include the promised schema changes. The git commit b4732a5 shows:
- New bank statement schema added with optional fields (accountHolderName, accountNumber, bankName, etc.)
- New company structure schema added under proof_of_ownership category
- Changes are properly implemented in the @ballerine/common package
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the contents of the updated packages for schema changes
# Check for schema-related changes in the common package
echo "Checking @ballerine/common for schema changes..."
rg -p "bank.*statement.*schema|company.*structure.*schema"
# Check package changelogs for breaking changes
echo "Checking changelogs for breaking changes..."
fd "CHANGELOG.md" | xargs rg "0\.(2\.27|5\.45|9\.52|6\.65|1\.25|2\.25)"
Length of output: 3569
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check recent commits in common package for schema-related changes
echo "Checking recent commits for schema changes..."
git log -p --grep="schema" -i packages/common/
# Look for schema files in common package
echo "Looking for schema files..."
fd "schema" packages/common/ -e json -e ts
# Check specific content of schema files that might be related
echo "Checking content of potential schema files..."
rg -p "bankStatement|companyStructure|proofOfOwnership" packages/common/
Length of output: 3778
packages/blocks/package.json (1)
5-5: LGTM: Version updates look compatible
The version bumps are minor and use caret ranges, allowing for compatible updates:
- Package version: 0.2.26 → 0.2.27
- @ballerine/config: ^1.1.24 → ^1.1.25
- @ballerine/eslint-config: ^1.1.24 → ^1.1.25
- @ballerine/common: ^0.9.50 → ^0.9.52
Also applies to: 45-46, 94-94
sdks/web-ui-sdk/package.json (2)
24-24: Version bump looks appropriate.
The patch version increment (1.5.52 -> 1.5.53) aligns with the nature of the changes (dependency updates).
99-99: Verify the @ballerine/common dependency contains the new schemas.
Since this PR introduces new schemas for financial information and proof of ownership, let's verify that version 0.9.52 of @ballerine/common includes these changes.
✅ Verification successful
The new schemas are present in @ballerine/common v0.9.52
The verification confirms that version 0.9.52 of @ballerine/common includes the new schemas for financial information and proof of ownership:
- Bank statement schema with fields for account details, bank name, and statement period
- Company structure schema with fields for ownership structure and parent company information
These were added in commit b4732a5 and are properly defined in the universal documents schema file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence of new schemas in @ballerine/common
# Look for schema files related to bank statements and company structure
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{ts,js,json}' -l 'bankStatement|companyStructure' packages/common
# Check the changelog or commit history for version 0.9.52
git log --oneline | rg "@ballerine/common.*0\.9\.52"
Length of output: 150
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find schema-related files and version information
# Search for schema files in the entire repository
fd -e json -e ts schema
# Look specifically for financial or ownership related schemas
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{ts,js,json}' -l 'financial|ownership|bank.*statement|company.*structure'
# Check package.json in common package for version
fd package.json --exec grep -l "@ballerine/common.*0\.9\.52"
# Look for recent changes in schema files
git log -p --since="3 months ago" -- "**/schema*.{ts,json}"
Length of output: 8896
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the specific version of @ballerine/common and recent schema changes
# Check the package.json in common package for its current version
cat packages/common/package.json | grep '"version"'
# Look for recent changes in financial/ownership related schemas
git log -p --since="3 months ago" -- "packages/common/src/schemas/**/*ownership*.ts" "packages/common/src/schemas/**/*financial*.ts" "packages/common/src/schemas/**/*bank*.ts"
# Check if there are any new schema files added recently
git log --name-status --since="3 months ago" -- "packages/common/src/schemas/**/*.ts"
# Look at the content of potentially relevant schema files
fd -t f . packages/common/src/schemas -e ts -e json --exec grep -l "bank\|financial\|ownership" {} \; -exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 3227
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the specific file that contains the new schemas
# Check the content of the modified file that contains the new schemas
cat packages/common/src/schemas/documents/workflow/documents/schemas/ZZ.ts
# Let's also check the package.json to see when version 0.9.52 was published
cat packages/common/package.json | grep -A 5 -B 5 '"version": "0.9.52"'
# Look at the commit that added the schemas in more detail
git show b4732a57c4288c5a034d7e4e0b267023ab718e74
Length of output: 10648
packages/react-pdf-toolkit/CHANGELOG.md (1)
3-10: LGTM! Version numbering and format are correct.
The changelog entry follows the established format and properly documents the dependency updates.
apps/backoffice-v2/package.json (1)
3-3: LGTM: Coordinated version updates across @ballerine packages
The version updates are consistent across all @ballerine packages, following a coordinated update pattern across the ecosystem. This maintains compatibility between interdependent packages.
Also applies to: 54-59, 150-151
packages/common/src/schemas/documents/workflow/documents/schemas/ZZ.ts (1)
50-64: Overall schema structure looks good!
The new document types maintain consistency with the existing schema patterns and follow the established structure for universal documents. The use of country code 'ZZ' appropriately indicates these are country-agnostic schemas.
Also applies to: 252-264
packages/blocks/CHANGELOG.md (1)
3-10: LGTM! Changelog entry follows the established format.
The version bump and dependency update are appropriately documented as patch changes.
packages/workflow-core/CHANGELOG.md (1)
3-10: Verify alignment with PR objectives.
The PR objectives mention new schemas for financial information and proof of ownership, but the changelog only shows a dependency bump. Please verify if:
- The schema changes are included in the @ballerine/common@0.9.52 update
- Additional changelog entries are needed to document the schema changes
✅ Verification successful
Based on the git log output and file changes, I can verify that the schema changes in @ballerine/common@0.9.52 include the addition of new schemas for financial information and proof of ownership:
- Financial information schema was added in
packages/common/src/schemas/documents/workflow/documents/schemas/ZZ.ts:
{
category: 'financial_information',
type: 'bank_statement',
issuer: { country: 'ZZ' },
issuingVersion: 1,
version: 1,
propertiesSchema: Type.Object({
accountHolderName: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
accountNumber: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
bankName: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
statementPeriod: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
issueDate: OptionalTypePastDate,
physicalAddress: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
}),
}- Proof of ownership schema was added in the same file:
{
category: 'proof_of_ownership',
type: 'company_structure',
issuer: { country: 'ZZ' },
issuingVersion: 1,
version: 1,
propertiesSchema: Type.Object({
companyName: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
ownershipStructure: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
parentCompanyName: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
documentDate: Type.Optional(Type.String({ format: 'date' })),
}),
}The changelog entry "Bump" is appropriate since it reflects these schema additions in the @ballerine/common dependency update.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the schema changes are included in the common package update
# Look for schema-related changes in recent commits
git log --oneline -p @ballerine/common@0.9.51..@ballerine/common@0.9.52 | rg -i "schema"
# Check for new or modified schema files
git diff @ballerine/common@0.9.51..@ballerine/common@0.9.52 -- "*.schema.json" "*.schema.ts"
Length of output: 487
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find schema-related changes
# First, let's find the common package location
fd -t d "common$" packages
# Then look for recent changes in schema files
git log --oneline -n 10 -p -- "packages/common/**/*schema*"
# Also check for any recent commits mentioning schemas
git log --oneline -n 10 -p | rg -i "schema"
# List all schema files to understand the structure
fd "schema" packages/common
Length of output: 278475
| ## 0.1.25 | ||
|
|
||
| ### Patch Changes | ||
|
|
||
| - Bump |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance changelog entries with meaningful information
The current changelog entries lack sufficient detail about the changes being made. Consider improving the changelog by:
- Adding meaningful descriptions of what changed
- Including links to PRs/commits
- Categorizing changes (features, fixes, breaking changes)
- Describing the impact of changes
- Following the Conventional Changelog format
Example format:
## [0.1.25] - 2024-11-XX
### Changed
- Updated dependency versions to maintain compatibility with @ballerine ecosystem
- Details of specific updates
- Impact of the changes
[0.1.25]: https://github.com/ballerine-io/ballerine/compare/v0.1.24...v0.1.25| - Bump | ||
| - Updated dependencies |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve changelog message descriptiveness
The current changelog message "Bump" is not descriptive enough. Consider following the conventional changelog format to clearly describe what changed and why. For example:
-Bump
+fix: update @ballerine/react-pdf-toolkit to version 1.2.45 for improved PDF generation capabilities📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - Bump | |
| - Updated dependencies | |
| - fix: update @ballerine/react-pdf-toolkit to version 1.2.45 for improved PDF generation capabilities | |
| - Updated dependencies |
| { | ||
| category: 'financial_information', | ||
| type: 'bank_statement', | ||
| issuer: { country: 'ZZ' }, | ||
| issuingVersion: 1, | ||
| version: 1, | ||
| propertiesSchema: Type.Object({ | ||
| accountHolderName: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | ||
| accountNumber: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | ||
| bankName: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | ||
| statementPeriod: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | ||
| issueDate: OptionalTypePastDate, | ||
| physicalAddress: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | ||
| }), | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance schema validation for bank statement properties.
While the basic structure is good, consider strengthening the validation:
statementPeriodshould have a specific format (e.g., "YYYY-MM" or date range)accountNumbermight benefit from a pattern validation- Consider adding essential financial fields:
balancecurrencytransactionPeriodStarttransactionPeriodEnd
propertiesSchema: Type.Object({
accountHolderName: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
- accountNumber: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
+ accountNumber: Type.Optional(Type.String({ pattern: '^[0-9]{8,34}$' })), // IBAN-compatible
bankName: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
- statementPeriod: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
+ statementPeriod: Type.Optional(Type.String({
+ pattern: '^[0-9]{4}-(0[1-9]|1[0-2])$' // YYYY-MM format
+ })),
issueDate: OptionalTypePastDate,
physicalAddress: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
+ balance: Type.Optional(Type.Number()),
+ currency: Type.Optional(Type.String({ pattern: '^[A-Z]{3}$' })), // ISO 4217
+ transactionPeriodStart: Type.Optional(Type.String({ format: 'date' })),
+ transactionPeriodEnd: Type.Optional(Type.String({ format: 'date' })),
}),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| { | |
| category: 'financial_information', | |
| type: 'bank_statement', | |
| issuer: { country: 'ZZ' }, | |
| issuingVersion: 1, | |
| version: 1, | |
| propertiesSchema: Type.Object({ | |
| accountHolderName: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | |
| accountNumber: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | |
| bankName: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | |
| statementPeriod: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | |
| issueDate: OptionalTypePastDate, | |
| physicalAddress: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | |
| }), | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| category: 'financial_information', | |
| type: 'bank_statement', | |
| issuer: { country: 'ZZ' }, | |
| issuingVersion: 1, | |
| version: 1, | |
| propertiesSchema: Type.Object({ | |
| accountHolderName: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | |
| accountNumber: Type.Optional(Type.String({ pattern: '^[0-9]{8,34}$' })), // IBAN-compatible | |
| bankName: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | |
| statementPeriod: Type.Optional(Type.String({ | |
| pattern: '^[0-9]{4}-(0[1-9]|1[0-2])$' // YYYY-MM format | |
| })), | |
| issueDate: OptionalTypePastDate, | |
| physicalAddress: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | |
| balance: Type.Optional(Type.Number()), | |
| currency: Type.Optional(Type.String({ pattern: '^[A-Z]{3}$' })), // ISO 4217 | |
| transactionPeriodStart: Type.Optional(Type.String({ format: 'date' })), | |
| transactionPeriodEnd: Type.Optional(Type.String({ format: 'date' })), | |
| }), | |
| }, |
| { | ||
| category: 'proof_of_ownership', | ||
| type: 'company_structure', | ||
| issuer: { country: 'ZZ' }, | ||
| issuingVersion: 1, | ||
| version: 1, | ||
| propertiesSchema: Type.Object({ | ||
| companyName: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | ||
| ownershipStructure: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | ||
| parentCompanyName: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | ||
| documentDate: Type.Optional(Type.String({ format: 'date' })), | ||
| }), | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance company structure schema to better represent ownership hierarchy.
The current schema might be too simplistic for capturing complex ownership structures. Consider:
- Structuring
ownershipStructureas an object array to capture ownership hierarchy - Adding fields for beneficial owners
- Adding validation for ownership percentages
- Adding fields for subsidiary relationships
propertiesSchema: Type.Object({
companyName: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
- ownershipStructure: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
+ ownershipStructure: Type.Optional(Type.Array(Type.Object({
+ entityName: Type.String(),
+ entityType: Type.Union([
+ Type.Literal('individual'),
+ Type.Literal('company'),
+ ]),
+ ownershipPercentage: Type.Number({
+ minimum: 0,
+ maximum: 100,
+ }),
+ isDirectOwner: Type.Boolean(),
+ }))),
parentCompanyName: Type.Optional(Type.String()),
+ subsidiaries: Type.Optional(Type.Array(Type.Object({
+ companyName: Type.String(),
+ ownershipPercentage: Type.Number({
+ minimum: 0,
+ maximum: 100,
+ }),
+ }))),
+ beneficialOwners: Type.Optional(Type.Array(Type.Object({
+ name: Type.String(),
+ ownershipPercentage: Type.Number({
+ minimum: 0,
+ maximum: 100,
+ }),
+ controlType: Type.Union([
+ Type.Literal('direct'),
+ Type.Literal('indirect'),
+ ]),
+ }))),
documentDate: Type.Optional(Type.String({ format: 'date' })),
}),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| { | |
| category: 'proof_of_ownership', | |
| type: 'company_structure', | |
| issuer: { country: 'ZZ' }, | |
| issuingVersion: 1, | |
| version: 1, | |
| propertiesSchema: Type.Object({ | |
| companyName: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | |
| ownershipStructure: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | |
| parentCompanyName: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | |
| documentDate: Type.Optional(Type.String({ format: 'date' })), | |
| }), | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| category: 'proof_of_ownership', | |
| type: 'company_structure', | |
| issuer: { country: 'ZZ' }, | |
| issuingVersion: 1, | |
| version: 1, | |
| propertiesSchema: Type.Object({ | |
| companyName: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | |
| ownershipStructure: Type.Optional(Type.Array(Type.Object({ | |
| entityName: Type.String(), | |
| entityType: Type.Union([ | |
| Type.Literal('individual'), | |
| Type.Literal('company'), | |
| ]), | |
| ownershipPercentage: Type.Number({ | |
| minimum: 0, | |
| maximum: 100, | |
| }), | |
| isDirectOwner: Type.Boolean(), | |
| }))), | |
| parentCompanyName: Type.Optional(Type.String()), | |
| subsidiaries: Type.Optional(Type.Array(Type.Object({ | |
| companyName: Type.String(), | |
| ownershipPercentage: Type.Number({ | |
| minimum: 0, | |
| maximum: 100, | |
| }), | |
| }))), | |
| beneficialOwners: Type.Optional(Type.Array(Type.Object({ | |
| name: Type.String(), | |
| ownershipPercentage: Type.Number({ | |
| minimum: 0, | |
| maximum: 100, | |
| }), | |
| controlType: Type.Union([ | |
| Type.Literal('direct'), | |
| Type.Literal('indirect'), | |
| ]), | |
| }))), | |
| documentDate: Type.Optional(Type.String({ format: 'date' })), | |
| }), | |
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
scripts/auto-commit.js (3)
Line range hint
23-23: Fix the OpenAI model name typoThe model name
gpt-4o-miniappears to be incorrect. OpenAI doesn't have a model with this name. Did you meangpt-4orgpt-3.5-turbo?- model: 'gpt-4o-mini', + model: 'gpt-4',
Line range hint
89-98: Enhance security for shell command executionThe script executes shell commands with user-provided input (editor path and commit message). While there is some sanitization, additional security measures could be implemented.
Consider these improvements:
- Validate the editor path against a whitelist
- Add input validation for the commit message
- Use
shelljsor similar library for safer command execution- const editor = process.env.EDITOR || 'vim'; + const allowedEditors = ['vim', 'nano', 'code']; + const defaultEditor = 'vim'; + const editor = allowedEditors.includes(process.env.EDITOR) + ? process.env.EDITOR + : defaultEditor;
Line range hint
71-85: Consider adding retry logic for OpenAI API callsThe script might benefit from retry logic when calling the OpenAI API to handle temporary failures or rate limits.
Would you like me to provide an implementation using a retry mechanism?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (40)
apps/backoffice-v2/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)apps/backoffice-v2/package.json(3 hunks)apps/kyb-app/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)apps/kyb-app/package.json(3 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json(3 hunks)examples/headless-example/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)examples/headless-example/package.json(2 hunks)examples/report-generation-example/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)examples/report-generation-example/package.json(2 hunks)packages/blocks/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/blocks/package.json(3 hunks)packages/common/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/common/package.json(2 hunks)packages/config/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/config/package.json(1 hunks)packages/eslint-config-react/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/eslint-config-react/package.json(2 hunks)packages/eslint-config/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/eslint-config/package.json(1 hunks)packages/react-pdf-toolkit/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/react-pdf-toolkit/package.json(2 hunks)packages/rules-engine/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/rules-engine/package.json(2 hunks)packages/ui/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/ui/package.json(3 hunks)packages/workflow-core/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/workflow-core/package.json(3 hunks)scripts/auto-commit.js(1 hunks)sdks/web-ui-sdk/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)sdks/web-ui-sdk/package.json(2 hunks)sdks/workflow-browser-sdk/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)sdks/workflow-browser-sdk/package.json(2 hunks)sdks/workflow-node-sdk/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)sdks/workflow-node-sdk/package.json(2 hunks)services/websocket-service/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)services/websocket-service/package.json(1 hunks)services/workflows-service/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)services/workflows-service/package.json(3 hunks)websites/docs/package.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/config/package.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (38)
- apps/backoffice-v2/CHANGELOG.md
- apps/backoffice-v2/package.json
- apps/kyb-app/CHANGELOG.md
- apps/kyb-app/package.json
- apps/workflows-dashboard/CHANGELOG.md
- apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json
- examples/headless-example/CHANGELOG.md
- examples/headless-example/package.json
- examples/report-generation-example/CHANGELOG.md
- examples/report-generation-example/package.json
- packages/blocks/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/blocks/package.json
- packages/common/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/common/package.json
- packages/config/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/eslint-config-react/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/eslint-config-react/package.json
- packages/eslint-config/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/eslint-config/package.json
- packages/react-pdf-toolkit/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/react-pdf-toolkit/package.json
- packages/rules-engine/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/rules-engine/package.json
- packages/ui/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/ui/package.json
- packages/workflow-core/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/workflow-core/package.json
- sdks/web-ui-sdk/CHANGELOG.md
- sdks/web-ui-sdk/package.json
- sdks/workflow-browser-sdk/CHANGELOG.md
- sdks/workflow-browser-sdk/package.json
- sdks/workflow-node-sdk/CHANGELOG.md
- sdks/workflow-node-sdk/package.json
- services/websocket-service/CHANGELOG.md
- services/websocket-service/package.json
- services/workflows-service/CHANGELOG.md
- services/workflows-service/package.json
- websites/docs/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
scripts/auto-commit.js (1)
38-38: LGTM: Character limit clarification is helpful
The addition of "including the roast" to the character limit guideline provides better clarity for the message format.
…ents - Introduce bank statement and company structure schemas - Enhance document properties for better clarity (These schemas have more categories than I have excuses for being late)
- Bump versions for @ballerine/common and related SDKs to 0.9.54 and 0.6.71 - Ensure consistent dependency updates in backoffice-v2, kyb-app, and SDKs (the only time your dependencies should be this tangled is in a family reunion)
…wnership
(These schemas are so well-defined, they could teach classes on clarity)
Summary by CodeRabbit
bank_statementfor financial information.company_structurefor proof of ownership.@ballerine/common,@ballerine/workflow-core, and others, ensuring compatibility and access to the latest features and fixes.