add factory dictionary as requested in #43 #47
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi @michaelneu Thank's a lot for your contribution. I will merge your FactoryDictionary in a while. I will also add export for DefaultDictionary for people familiar with Python. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR implements a FactoryDictionary as requested in #43. The FactoryDictionary is implemented by extending the default Dictionary and adding the default value functionality similar to Pythons
defaultdict.Why _Factory_Dictionary rather than _Default_Dictionary?
IMO "Default" feels more like the one you should always use over the other ones, whereas Factory better describes the dictionary's behaviour