-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release - February 2018 - Target RC date: 2018-02-01 - name: 0.11.0 #3959
Comments
@katre - assigning to you for Feb 1. Please lmk if that does not work. |
I can manage it. |
I will. I plan to check tomorrow's nightly and cut then. |
Taking 00d781a as the baseline (from last night's nightly run: https://ci.bazel.build/view/Dashboard/job/bazel/job/nightly/212/) Next step is to build the RC, then start filing bugs on the test failures. |
Release note edits: |
Release is pushed, waiting for https://ci.bazel.build/job/bazel/job/release/1282/ to finish |
@katre : Please replace the following in the release notes:
With this:
|
Actually, @katre , please remove that entry I mentioned altogether. I discovered a bug about it, filing it now, will update this comment with the bug number. |
How long will the fix be? I'd prefer to edit the release notes and get your fix cherrypicked along with the fix for #4562 in the next RC. |
I can write the fix tomorrow and, if all goes well, get it submitted tomorrow or the day after. |
SGTM, thanks. |
@katre : bugfix is out for review (https://bazel-review.googlesource.com/c/bazel/+/37190), we'll need a cherrypick. |
#4598 is a blocker, will need a cherrypick. |
Please cherrypick d855d81 into RC2. |
We need to cherrypick 56aeb04, ideally into 0.10.1. |
@ola-rozenfeld I'll add that to the cherrypick list for 0.11.0rc2. For 0.10.1 you'll need to ping the release issue for 0.10.0, which is #4325 . |
Current release blocking bugs for 0.11.0:
I'll need to verify the sequencing when all cherrypicks are collected. |
… On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:34 PM, katre ***@***.***> wrote:
Current release blocking bugs for 0.11.0:
- #4585 <#4585> - orphaned
remote cached actions fallback broken
- 56aeb04
<56aeb04>
- The issue is still open: @ola-rozenfeld
<https://github.com/ola-rozenfeld> are there more commits coming?
- #4608 <#4608> - test
stdout is sometimes missing
- There is a fix in the works
- #4598 <#4598> - runfiles
library should not pick up TEST_SRCDIR
- There appear to be several commits, but the issue is still open.
@laszlocsomor <https://github.com/laszlocsomor> are there more
commits coming?
- d855d81
<d855d81>
- Does not reference the issue, I assume it is related?
- d7b6a77
<d7b6a77>
- 13c3373
<13c3373>
- #4562 <#4562> - Fixed
- ea2d4c4
<ea2d4c4>
I'll need to verify the sequencing when all cherrypicks are collected.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3959 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AYoKuA7EKgQZZ9gAvUpphCkmdC41WIloks5tSz5KgaJpZM4QEZgf>
.
|
Pushed |
Thanks @petemounce! |
No.
Cherry-pick this please. Bummer. It should reference the bug. That is the bugfix. No cherry-pick. This is related, but I don't need you to cherry-pick it; it just adds tests for the bugfix. No cherry-pick. This is distantly related; it fixes the same bug in the Python runfiles library as d855d81 did in the Java runfiles library. However 0.11.0 does not contain the original commits for the Py runfils library, so this commit needs not be cherry-picked. |
Thanks for clarifying! |
Creating RC2.
Release note edits: removed section of java runfiles (as per #3959 (comment)). |
It's also possibly a bug in my bisect script, grump grump... |
0.11.0 shipped in Homebrew. |
@ilovezfs Thanks! I appreciate you working with me to help resolve the issue. |
You're welcome! |
@ilovezfs big thanks ! awesome! |
I think the automation I wrote is affected by https://githubengineering.com/crypto-removal-notice/. I'll fix and push soonest, but not around this weekend. |
Up now at https://chocolatey.org/packages/bazel/0.11.0 via a manual hack. |
thanks so much @petemounce ... ur work is awesome |
My pleasure :) |
Thanks very much @petemounce! With this finished, I am closing the issue for this release. |
Release command:
|
Release branch is https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/tree/release-0.11.1 |
cc: @vbatts |
hey hey! Been a while since you CC'ed, but usually blogtrottr.com does a good job emailing as soon as you tag the releases but didn't get notification of 0.11.0 🤔 https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vbatts/bazel/builds/ has up to 0.10.1 |
perhaps i'll just jump to 0.11.1 once it's out? |
@vbatts I apologize. I have just noticed this myself a few hours ago and that's why I pinged you :-). It's up to you. 0.11.1 should be out next week. We are currently working on a new release process and we'll be able to set it up so that we can automatically send you an e-mail. Again, apologies for not pinging you. |
Right on. I'll wait til 0.11.1 :-)
…On Fri, Mar 2, 2018, 15:59 Jakob Buchgraber ***@***.***> wrote:
@vbatts <https://github.com/vbatts> I apologize. I have just noticed this
myself a few hours ago and that's why I pinged you :-). It's up to you.
0.11.1 should be out next week.
We are currently working on a new release process and we'll be able to set
it up so that we can automatically send you an e-mail. Again, apologies for
not pinging you.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3959 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEF6VrLdpSHx7Wh_mwAmJMWikD4JK38ks5tabLFgaJpZM4QEZgf>
.
|
I'm working to get this pushed as a release, but am currently fighting with our scripts a bit. Sorry for the delay! Hope to get it out by tomorrow. |
I had to recreate the release branch on my machine, as otherwise the script wouldn't let me release it. Steps:
Now waiting for CI to build the binaries, will verify that they're fine and will run the release steps for GitHub, GCS and the apt repository then. |
Release was built successfully: https://buildkite.com/bazel/release/builds/11 🎉 |
fedora and centos build is kicked off:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vbatts/bazel/build/725354/
…On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:19 AM Philipp Wollermann ***@***.***> wrote:
Release was built successfully:
https://buildkite.com/bazel/release/builds/11
and released:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bazel-discuss/lmuaMaYiY-o/r8CCYqO6AAAJ 🎉
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3959 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEF6fTMWVjJ85n0KnZjXY_O2pHRIxsnks5tb_j3gaJpZM4QEZgf>
.
|
tyvm @vbatts |
0.11.1 is published to chocolatey. |
ty @petemounce ! |
Release tracking bug for February 2018:
RM if we follow the rotation should be @katre: can you take it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: