-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 543
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for additional py_binary
kwargs in entry_point
#600
Comments
one possible solution would be if you could use an i tried to do it but it needs a |
i have a ~hacky workaround for this problem here https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/pull/19450/files#diff-41e9a812f4081144b27bc30f768b83820451109ca362e1b1ad125a04a9ffcd0bR76 |
#575 expands on the same pattern. I think there's value in having isolated targets but perhaps there can be an additional macro that defines a Or, perhaps with |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity for 180 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs in 30 days. |
This issue was automatically closed because it went 30 days without a reply since it was labeled "Can Close?" |
🚀 feature request
Relevant Rules
entry_point
py_binary
Description
afaict, you cant pass kwargs - eg
args
,data
etc into anentry_point
rule, it would be handy if you couldDescribe the solution you'd like
To be able to do something like
Describe alternatives you've considered
wrapping the entry_point one way or another to call it with the required
data
,args
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: