forked from sensorflo/adoc-mode
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#49 Don't flyspell links #50
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
082a563
#49 Let font-lock mark links and alike by text prop adoc-flyspell-ign…
TobiasZawada d757c1f
#49 Fix merge problem
TobiasZawada 7f51cc8
#49 Check the last letter of the preceding word for adoc-flyspell-ignore
TobiasZawada a5e7251
Replace null by not.
TobiasZawada 13836c2
Fix #47. Changelog entry for issue #47
TobiasZawada File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this needed? Seems kind of redundant to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The Jit-Lock version of Font-lock is free to fontify only the visible part of the buffer if large yanks of text are inserted.
flycheck-buffer
on the other hand does not care about visibility. So we ensure that theadoc-flycheck-ignore
property is correctly applied byfont-lock-ensure
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would come with a performance hit, though, that's why I was wondering if it's really needed. I'm also not sure how often people use
flyspell-buffer
- e.g. I never use it myself.I think at the very least we should add some note explaining the need for this, as I don't think that's obvious.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The performance hit is minimized by that junk of
jit-lock-fontify-now
: